The code still looks stylistically modern, except for its use of getopt, but that's a library issue, not a syntax one. It's by far from "almost unrecognizable."
Can you therefore elaborate with an example from that era?
But the point of my post wasn't to bash Python but rather to note that Ruby got an unusually large number of thing right on the first try.
List comprehensions have been around in Python since 2000 and generator expressions were introduced in 2.3 (but you could import them from __future__ as early as 2.2) and also build generators without them.
Every future version of Python that tweaks the class system will always be able to claim every previous version didn't have "new classes".
Decorators (we don't call them annotations) have syntactic support since 2.4.
I'm not an expert in Ruby's evolution but it certainly looks like it got a lot of stuff right. I can't find much about its evolution, however. I'd like to see how it changed over time.
=)
Ruby 1.9 had various changes over 1.8, like those listed at http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/getting_code_ready_... .
Some of the new things in 1.8 include allocate, respond_to, fully qualified names, Array#zip, and "In Ruby 1.8.0, both break and return exit the scope of the proc, but do not exit the scope of the caller."
That reads like Ruby of 1.6 (about 10 years ago) would be stylistically different from modern Ruby, in about the same way that Python is stylistically different.
Going back further, early Ruby had a lot more influence from Perl, like magic variable names and the "discouraged" flip-flop operator. The plan is to remove these in some still hypothetical Ruby 3.
But, code I write now for Python 2.7 looks very different. I use:
list comprehensions sets with...as yield new "collections" classes like Counter looping constructs like enumerate and zip
It's true that you could implement the last two in Python 1.6. But the first four are new language constructs. And list comprehensions, in particular, can be sprinkled all around, not just localized like with/as and yield.
In short, the language has grown. Old stuff looks OK, new stuff looks new.