Why are shopping carts always broken?
cnn.com
cnn.com
Reminds me of summers spent working for the school district, replacing the glides on the feet of the metal tubed classroom chairs so the broken ones wouldn’t wobble or tear up the linoleum tiles. https://www.allglides.com/metalbase.html
All part of the hidden world of keeping shit working I guess
The real story was well worth the read, but I only read it once I twigged what the fan had to do with the story.
I’ve experienced broken carts, but not often enough to say “man, those things are always broken”
cnn is news entertainment.
> While the rubber wheels cost twice the price of the standard polyurethane ones, Diaz said P&H Casters’ natural rubber wheels can last for about a decade, barring mistreatment from customers. In a busier store environment, they can hold out between four and five years.
> However, many retailers choose cheaper parts because the upfront price is typically higher for more durable material, Poulos added.
Shopping trolleys are one of those topics where the more you look, the more you find: especially when it comes to the wheels.
For example despite the article mentioning rubber as being superior to PU - it's not always suitable, or even safe. Such as for malls which use ramp-style escalators which allow a shopping trolley to be moved between floors. These must employ PU wheels which have grooves that match the escalator. This lowers the shopping trolley sufficiently for a rubber-brake to press against the ramp, preventing the trolley from moving.
An example of the grooved PU wheel and rubber-brake can be seen here: https://www.industrial-casterwheels.com/china-escalator_trol...
Which seems insane because if you buy replacement suspension parts for cars, the long lasting polyurethane replacements always cost more than the OEM style rubber ones.
We can try to blame weather, people, stack problem, ethics, cart design, economic downturns or taxes, but that's all a misdirection. The blame lies squarely on some middle manager who either enforces maintaining and replacement of the carts or he doesn't.
You can't blame a million middle managers. If all middle managers are doing something wrong, that's a problem of org design.
The same is true across the board. One corrupt congressman? Bad apple. 100 of them in a government? Something is wrong with the way the system is set up. One bad teacher? Bad apple. Most teachers are bad? You're looking at some issue with hiring practices, training, salary, incentives, management, accountability, transparency, administration, or something else.
These problems get hard to solve when blame is misplaced. You can't fix an org structure if you can't talk about teachers doing bad things since people confound that with bad teachers. The exact same person can be the most and the least competent based on the situation they're in.
Sure you can't blame a million middle managers, because they are all in different barrels, but congress people are in the same barrel, and if one is corrupt we might assume that non-corrupt ones will be corrupted over time by exposure.
Many systems can be set up to ease spoiling, thus creating a two-tiered problem, when the teachers are all bad because the system promotes bad teachers you can't fix it just by fixing the system because you have a crop of teachers in their barrels waiting to rot any newcomer and also rising to positions where they can put regulations in place to ease rottenness in the future.
If we were to evaluate teachers in ways which didn't align to tests (or not at all), put in mechanisms to fire bad teachers, added transparency and accountability (so parents know what's going wrong and can try to advocate to fix it), etc. we would have a whole new teaching culture... circa 2044.
A faster reboot is possible, but with more disruption (e.g. wholesale firing). Disruption is harmful in several ways, from impacting morale and stability (making it more difficult to bring in qualified people), to having experienced people leave, to simply taking time to learn how to work in the new order. Whether a disruption is warranted depends on the level of organizational dysfunction.
The current set of dysfunctions in schools specifically are grounded in a narrow tests which were implemented in 2002. Schools have increasingly broken, as anything not in Common Core was increasingly ignored, and schools competed on the only measure they were evaluated on.
If instead you can order a few new carts “when you feel low” there’s nothing preventing someone at the store putting the annoying dead cart into the dumpster.
Never underestimate the friction paperwork causes.
(Footnote: I still think there may be better ones out there worth trying. But I much prefer this to warlords roving the land, or being a serf in a fiefdom)
On the other hand, in my area, I have never seen a broken cart, perhaps because they require coins to operate.
I think the root of the issue is the people who use them, coins or not.
FIFO is more likely to keep pushing the bad one to the front, whereas lifo will eventually have the far carts be the bad ones.
But I’ve rarely if ever had a bad cart so maybe this is an issue somewhere else. It is amazing to realize that at about $200-400 a pop, the average Walmart has something like a quarter million dollars worth of carts.
Free college tuition for one. Defined retirement. Very decent health care (better than a well known Southern multinational you've heard about corporate care)
It's all gone now, I believe, now that the family list control of it (but I thought the employees owned half of it :S ?)
It is just that shops do not care nor are willing to pay someone to spend the 15 to 30 minutes[1] every day to it takes check and fix them.
[1] if they were checked daily, most of them would stay in shape so a very little amount of them would need a fix per day.
This is tracks with my experience. I used to work for a mid-sized US grocery chain in the Midwest (Farmer Jack if anyone remembers those, gone now) and I once got reprimanded for cleaning the cart wheels. I didn't even have to take the wheels apart most of the time, just get in there with some WD-40 or pop out the small bits of concrete or rock with a screwdriver. Apparently that was a waste of time in my manager's eyes since "the carts were always broken anyway" and I was supposed to be unloading stock.
In need of service yes.
Do countries other than the US have shopping carts in their "drug stores"?
In my corner of the USA the only 24 hour pharmacy is in the children's hospital, about 15 miles away from my house.
I have three hospitals with ERs within 5 miles but no pharmacy.
They were much more common before Covid, when places like Walmart were 24 hours.
But I also wonder if it's just the very largest cities that have easy 24 hour pharmacy access.
I live near a city with population of about 50k. It has a 24 hour Walgreens.
So, in the USA they are called "drug stores" because they sell... drugs. Prescription and over the counter. Are these really called drug stores, or using the German word for drugs, even though they don't sell them... because of their overlap with the non-drug business that the American ones have come to donate more square feet (and prob more revenue) to? Or for other reasons unrelated to USA practice?
I'm actually not sure if the definition of over-the-counter drugs can be applied in the same way in Germany. We have prescription drugs and non-prescription drugs. Non-prescription drugs are still limited to be sold by pharmacies only by default, for example Ibuprofen (but only in small quantities). Some selected categories of less potent drugs or pharmaceutical products can be sold by any store (and even then only if they can prove they employ someone with sufficient expertise).
There is some overlap with the two as the pharmacies also sell OTC drugs. edit: The pharmacy where I used to live as a kid was more of a drug store in the US sense with a pharmacy in the back, which also acts as the cashier, and the rest of the store was filled with all kinds of household products like beauty and cleaning.
Please tell me it's not the drinking kind?
I’ve always wondered what convoluted logic lead to passing such a law in 1889, or whenever they thought it was a good idea.
Hard liquor over a certain alcohol percent is only available at a state liquor agency.
One has to distinguish between "[die] Drogerie" (more explizit term: "[das] Drogeriefachgeschäft") und "[der] Drogeriemarkt" (in particular in Austria and Switzerland this is strongly distinguished).
Drogerien are specialized shops with well-trained salespeople (Drogist: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drogist). Drogeriemärkte, on the other hand, are convenience stores that sell cleaning agents, cosmetics, nutritional supplements, ... Because in the latter, prizes are typically much cheaper, they replaced Drogerien in many cases.
The modern word Droge/drug does not mean what it used to mean.
In Spain in a "droguería" you would find something quite similar to a DM: cleaning supplies, some chemicals, personal hygiene and cosmetic products and the like. A "drogaria" in Portugal probably would a bit more similar like a hardware store, but also in the theme...
Yeah, it's a very historical thing dating back from times of Marco Polo, the Silk Road, and the likes.
In France we have "pharmacie", "droguerie", "épicerie", and "quincaillerie".
- "pharmacie" is the regulated medical thing, historically it was "apothicaire" (apothecary)
- "quincaillerie" is where you get hardware ("quincaille") like screws, tubes, metal parts, and whatnot, and by extension, tools. By extension "quincaille" coloquially refers to small, cheap stuff in a derogatory way (akin to "lemon" but for small things).
- "droguerie" is where you get various general usage, non-medical stuff, from hygiene to ; it is part of "épicerie", where it used to be "all manners of drugs sold under the merchand guild, from dye pigments to perfume, hygiene products and cosmetics, as well as medicine". In the XVIII century the "drugs" term largely meant "things of small value that you can put on the market" and "mixes for which only artists and craftsmen hold the secret".
With this definition you can see how it grew from "épicerie" (=> "spicery", a shop for spice) from the economy market of bringing such goods from specific countries like North Africa, Middle East, India, China and whatnot. Pigments, spice, and medicine were obtained from foreign sources and highly sought after. Of course this could involve a deal of mysticism and exotic mystery, a perfect recipe for snake-oil medicine and once medical goods began to be regulated it is left with "alternative" medicinal things.
- "épicerie" used to cover all of the above, but today it's your corner-shop that has a bit of everything and is open most of the time to 24/7 (bordering on the illegal, or outright skirting opening hour laws) and saves you in a pinch. These businesses are often held by people of above areas ascendance, not really surprising given the history of it.
- "Farmacia" for the regulated drugs
- "Quincalla" is cheap hardware that you could find on a flea market or maybe a corner-shop. Old terms for places that would sell that kind of stuff would be "quincallería" or "chamarilería", but today you would probably go to a "bazar".
- And, as I anticipated, the "opens till late and has a bit of everything" store would be a "bazar", although sometimes is referred using the nationality or origin of the managers (usually from South Asia or China, at least on Spain)
Our local gas station stores are bigger than the first supermarkets, probably. Multiple aisles and fresh produce, etc.
Maybe no trollies though.
I was thinking you might have been meaning Denmark or something, as it wasn't clear. :)
Didn't down vote you though.
Thanks for the comment :)
The UK passed a law in 1998 about it and saw suicides from overdoses drop 21% and liver transplants from paracetamol poisoning drop 66%.
"Numbers of tablets per pack of paracetamol and salicylates decreased markedly in the year after the change in legislation on 16 September 1998. The annual number of deaths from paracetamol poisoning decreased by 21% (95% confidence interval 5% to 34%) and the number from salicylates decreased by 48% (11% to 70%). Liver transplant rates after paracetamol poisoning decreased by 66% (55% to 74%). The rate of non-fatal self poisoning with paracetamol in any form decreased by 11% (5% to 16%), mainly because of a 15% (8% to 21%) reduction in overdoses of paracetamol in non-compound form."
Obviously you can still overdose by going to multiple stores and popping them all out of the blister packs but it puts enough of a barrier in that you have to be more determined (and more knowledgeable about what amount will actually kill you). Apparently it works.
You can essentially forget the maximum pill numbers for paracetamol/ibuprofen when it comes to prescriptions in the UK. Doctors can prescribe hundreds of either pill to be given to a patient at once (eg if someone is prescribed to take 8 a day and they get their meds monthly, as is the case with one paracetamol recipient I know, the pharmacy gives him multiple 100x 500mg paracetamol boxes each month.)
(To be clear, "given to them at once" as in dispensing the pills, not giving to take all at once!)
They do that indeed, though I am not sure wthere it is the law of their own "do-gooder" policies. I don't think it is the law because it happened to me a few times to just pull a sad face and have the employee at the till just go "fine, but just this time".
This is slightly ridiculous, IMHO: You can buy more if you want, just split transactions. And of course no-one stops you from buying a trolley-full of vodka and bleach.
You can split transactions, but committing suicide takes effort, and a relatively significant rate of suicides are impulsive. For impulsive suicide, having a barrier or interruption can prevent the attempt. Something as small as a phone call interrupting you as you get the pills out could be sufficient to move past a particular impulse.
There is also a huge difference in suicide attempt method depending on gender. Women tend to gravitate towards pills, while men are more likely to use a gun.
So IMHO this restriction is an attempt at limiting the stock people have at home. Although I would argue this is none of the shop's business and, as far as I can gather, this is not a legal restriction.
Correct. But this isn't a bad thing - it means people are less likely to have a large supply of dangerous pills at hand if they get a sudden urge to kill themselves or attempt a cry for help during a depressive episode.
> Although I would argue this is none of the shop's business
In practical terms it appears that this actually does reduce suicides and poisonings; it's a significant reduction in suffering in the world.
The cost is a very small and temporary limitation on personal convenience. It's surely worth it. See also seatbelt laws.
> and, as far as I can gather, this is not a legal restriction.
It is in some countries, but the legal obligation is on the vendor, not the individual. If you are confident that you do need a larger cache of tablets then you can do that yourself with only minimal extra inconvenience.
I think it's an elegant solution. Suicides are reduced, but the state doesn't overrule individual decision making on what their needs are.
Those 'voluntary' limitations, and there are others, are a bit of a pet peeve of mine because they strike me as hypocrisy/posturing/paternalism.
Limiting to two... I don't know, it has occasionally annoyed me (when I think I want to 'stock up') but I suppose there's just no reason you actually need more than that at once (other than self-harm or with a prescription) so meh why not if it has a small chance at stopping a few suicide attempts.
Are there lots of cases where someone tried to overdose but was saved by it 'only' being 16 grams of paracetamol?
Most suicidality is impulsive and transient, so simple interventions to reduce access to means of suicide can have very significant results. There's very little you can do to prevent a sufficiently determined person from dying by suicide, but most people who die by suicide aren't strongly motivated to die - they're just briefly overwhelmed by life.
https://www.bmj.com/content/329/7474/1076
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/saves...
I can only speak from my experience, but at one point I took all the paracetamol I had (suicidal and pretty drunk, the taste of cheap red wine and paracetamol is... unpleasant to say the least). I ended up fine after a friend forced me to go to the hospital the next day. If I had more tablets around, I would have taken them too. So it likely wouldn't stop someone who planned to kill themselves, however with me anyway not having like 100 tablets around did help due to it being impulsive enough.
It might have been quite a big difference due to how long after the fact I went to the hospital, I took quite a lot but it had done little enough damage that some medicine in my arm over the course of about a day and having to avoid alcohol and paracetamol for a while was enough to fix it.
I imagine a lot of cases are quite similar to mine and it probably did make quite a big difference with me as I only had 2 boxes around and one wasn't completely full.
Your nose is running? Pop some NyQuil. Hangover? NyQuil. Headache from the cold? NyQuil. Cold? NyQuil.
Just look at the list of symptoms it helps with at their site: https://vicks.com/en-us/shop-products/nyquil
https://tedium.co/2021/11/03/nyquil-cold-medicine-history/
https://www.npr.org/2022/09/22/1124252556/nyquil-chicken-cha...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fda-nyquil-chicken-warning_n_...
Yes, it's very common, often around joint pain. Surely obesity and sedentary lifestyle play a role.
60 million Americans take Acetaminophen (paracetamol) on a weekly basis.
---
In Australia, the regulating body for that stuff announced new limits back in 2023. They'll apply from Feb 2025 onwards:
https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/tga-makes-final-d...
* reduce the maximum size of packs available for general sale (e.g. supermarkets and convenience stores) from 20 to 16 tablets or capsules
* reduce the maximum size of packs available in pharmacies without the supervision of a pharmacist (i.e. ‘Pharmacy Only’ packs) from 100 to 50 tablets or capsules
* make other pack sizes of up to 100 tablets or capsules available only under the supervision of a pharmacist (‘Pharmacist Only’ medicines).
Those limits don't seem all that different from the existing pack sizes commonly on shelves though. So there's very likely some existing limits around pack sizes already.
Stores like Target buy nice carts and they last longer, stores like Menard's buy even cheaper carts (they might even make their own, they build their own electric scooters for in-store use).
I worked at a company in an adjacent business, most store chains either have their own service techs, or outsource it to a service company. These guys repair anything with wheels, from shopping carts to bakery carts to those hand carts and jack lifts. But there's only so much budget to go around and the carts get replaced every couple years anyway, it's easier to just recycle them.
*this one fact probably goes a long way towards explaining why they don't get fixed
If you want to see the problem, watch carts being put in the cart storage pens and watch carts being returned from those pens to the store.
A very small percentage of the carts will end up in pens off kilter, then pushed in by the entire line of carts behind them. This bit of pressure can bend the wheel attachment. Now you say "this is only one or two carts", but in a busy store that cart can be cycles 5-10 times a day so this abuse adds up.
Then, watch the carts get returned to the front of the store. The handler pulls out a 40' long 'cart snake' that is unwieldly and heavy. You'll watch them drag the entire line sideways at points to get it in line with traveling the right direction and to line up with the return lines. Getting dragged sideways both wears flat spots in the wheels and it can bend the castors or pop the soft part of the wheel of its rim.
This may be an American problem. In the UK and many European countries, shopping carts ("trolleys") have castors on all four wheels; they will quite happily glide sideways. This makes them more maneuverable in the smaller stores, at the cost of being more difficult to control - more like the ship in Asteroids than a go-kart.
To turn a fully castored cart, you apply physics - all you have to do is orient the cart so that is pointed sideways, then push hard. The key is then to maintain the cart pointing 90 degrees to the direction of travel throughout the turn, so that you can oppose centripetal force merely by pushing - no torque required. When the turn is complete, simply stop pushing. The cart will at this point still be oriented sideways of course, but you can correct this easily at your leisure.
And yes, we don't usually have those 10m cart snakes, only if one pen overflows and workers take a huge chunk to relocate them.
Shopping carts are significantly durable for their acquisition cost and must be a design buyers are satisficed by.
Target larger store shopping carts seem more rugged and smoother rolling than conventional all metal ones.
Boundary antitheft systems generally address the theft problem. Perhaps these can be extended with app to leave a deposit for disabled, elderly people, and others to temporarily borrow carts for community neighbors without transportation.
PS: In the 80's, it always annoyed me when my aunt would "borrow" a shopping cart and then keep it until going to the store next like it was her personal property.
Examples:
Leaky faucets; squeaky cabinet/door hinges; door thresholds that let water inside only when it's a huge storm with heavy winds and rain; cars that only start after several attempts; my blog host which requires several failed attempts before uploading an image; grocery stores (Kroger and Harris Teeter, for two) that have only a single checkout line manned by a person — often new or old and slow — so as to "encourage" customers to use the many self-checkout stations; credit card readers that require several attempts before acceptance; gas station pumps which increasingly require more personal information before allowing you to put the darn nozzle in your car; phone and tablet touchscreens covered with fingerprints and skin debris and dust etc. but still quite usable; eyeglasses with the same issues; clothing you know isn't fresh but that's still wearable if the alternative is doing the laundry; running out of coffee beans and using instant as opposed to taking the time and effort to buy fresh beans.
I'm sure others here have equally amusing exemplars....
I had never heard of the conspiracy theory that it was done on purpose to slow people down. That doesn’t really pass the smell test. When I have a bad cart I want to leave as soon as possible to minimize my time with it. It also makes me view the store in a negative light. These are both bad things, and it seems pretty obvious that they would get damaged over time from abuse.
I've been extremely annoyed by Walmart carts. The carts themselves are usually fine once I get one separated from the rest. It's the separating them that is annoying.
When a cart has other carts nested into it from behind, that raises the back flap. The two straps on that flap that are used to strap in small children when they are riding can dangled down through the grill of the flap on the nested cart. The clip on the end is big enough that if it twists at all it can get jammed in that nested grill, and the carts are then stuck together.
If you don't realize that the strap is caught and just think the carts are pushed tight, pulling to loosen them wedges the strap clip in very tight. Then you need to reach under to lift the bottom flap to relieve some pressure, while trying to un-wedge the clip. It's awkward and although I've not yet done it it looks like it is possible you get get an annoying pinch if you let go of the flap at the wrong time.
If it really was about stealing (taking and intentionally keeping), the 1€ or free plastic coin you can get at the counter wouldn't deter you at all.
Most homeless and poor people know this trick. It really is just for general populace who are too gullible to know better.
I know you didn't mean it this way but this is an incredibly funny way of putting it. "The globalists don't want you to know this, but the shopping carts at Publix are free..."
I never encounter broken shopping carts. It's just not a Thing, at least in Houston.
I dislike this system. I don't go to Aldi very often, and I never have change on my person or in the car. So I grab a cardboard box (which Aldi makes available to customers) and fill that up as I walk around the store.
So I buy less than I would if I had a cart.
Four wheel steering solves a very nasty problem for Japan and Europe - need to turn on tight corners. Expensive real estate -> narrow aisles -> no room to maneuver the cart.
Win for four wheel steering.
The problem, however, is that the fixed rears anchor the cart. They help the cart to take a straight line. The greater steering effort is more than offset by not having to constantly juggle a cart trying to spin on itself. So if you have wide, long aisles like in the US two wheel steering is a lot less effort.
Pro tip - if your cart is very heavy, and there is a tight corner, steer it from the end opposite the handles. It'll literally turn on itself with very little effort
Because, there are many lines and the chance you get in the fast line is like 1-in-N where N is the number of lines.
What I find frustrating about my local grocery store is when they inexplicably rearrange items. One week, bread is stocked in one aisle. Suddenly, on my next trip to the store, the same brand of bread has moved two aisles over.
Part of the reason why I switched to having groceries delivered.
I hate it. They’re not bringing them back, I’ve asked.
I ask because some Walmarts got rid of hand baskets. When they stopped providing free plastic bags at checkout there was a big rise in people carrying their purchases out in the hand baskets and then not returning the baskets. Those stores often decided to stop replacing the baskets.
I would not be surprised if the same thing happened at other stores.
Some kind of psychological thing.
People learned what broke (front wheel that were slammed into things) and redesigned/reinforced appropriately.
Usually it’s a cart maintenance company that comes in the middle of the night when the store is closed. Only time I’ve ever seen one is at a 24-hour store.
Where I lived, decades ago one store tried this. They ended up folding because no one wanted to deal with inserting coins, why:
1. What if you had no coins ? Most people in the US dump all coins in a big jar when the get home. I would guess back then, about 30% of the people never carried coins, so the chain instantly lost some market share. Now it is more like 90%.
2. These days, just about everyone under 35 do not carry cash, never mind coins. Back then, this was not too much an issue.
3. At the time, homeless people would cruse the parking log, breaking the device to get the coin. The store would have to replace the devices often.
FWIW, where I buy food, I would sat only 10% or less carriages have issues. Years ago it was much higher but I guess the chain does something different that other chains.
Point 3: doesn’t make sense. The carts don’t have coins stored when they aren’t in use by a customer.
You saw this was decades ago :)
For the plastic tokens, almost no one in the US (at least were I live) would deal with these plastic tokens. I very much doubt that would be accepted.
Also we have deposits on bottles, most people here just toss the in the trash, not bothering to return them. I am sure forcing carriage returns would lose the chain many customers.
For it to work, every single chain would have to adopt this at the same time. Not going to work where I am in the US.
It doesn't mean the system can't work. It means the deposit is way too low.
With coin locks, customers are still “pulling carts through bumpy parking lots, wrestling them across the threshold of doorways in and out of the store, and forcing them up and down the curb.”
The only difference maybe is they are all being returned to a covered cart shed that is protected from the elements.
Then why blame the customer with all that stuff above?
Does it still serve this purpose when they give you a token like this, or, just have they like ended up with carts with this mechanism they don't really want and would be happy enough with carts without it too? I'm not following the point of it.
I just hold on to one in case I need it in my wallet.
Plus once it's a generalized system and all carts require coins, it's not like you have the choice anymore.
Reminds of a big festival I went to in Germany. Beers were 5 euro and came in a sturdy plastic mug. Bring the mug back and get a euro back. 5 mugs and a free beer. I’ve never seen a place so clean after such a large party.
I find it much more maneuverable, which is important in our smaller aisles. US-style ones would be a nightmare.
That being said, I think both Costco and Ikea should probably conform to local standards.
The article's byline credits Eva Rothenberg, whose LinkedIn lists her as living in New York City. There must be horrible people there.
Here in Waxahachie, TX, there are almost no broken shopping carts, and people help when there is a broken cart.
A significant factor is also whether the local areas uses salt on the roads or not.
There are at least N failure modes for shopping carts:
* shopping cart wheels not coplanar
* shopping cart wheel does not turn
* shopping cart left in parking lot during weather
* shopping cart removed from parking lot entirely
There is better social cohesion and respect for other people's property. Now, there are some oddities in that if they find you lying on the street hurt, most will pass you by and kind of look at you quizzically, but they also do have good samaritans, just not as many. The reason is often people will suspect the person who stopped to help stopped out of guilt, not because they were just trying to help.
Would you say the difference in income in the places in Asia that you're describing were on the same level as in Manhattan?
There are very poor parts of America where people take more care of shopping carts, there are very rich parts of America where people take more care of shopping carts. But a thing happens when you have a notable population of mentally ill homeless people living on the same streets that New York level wealthy citizens also use. The person I replied to is from Texas, where they round up inconvenient people and either bus them or fly them to other states - including New York. That's certainly one way to level out the income inequality in the region.
>There is better social cohesion and respect for other people's property. Now, there are some oddities in that if they find you lying on the street hurt, most will pass you by and kind of look at you quizzically, but they also do have good samaritans, just not as many.
On that note, comparing "places in Asia" to New York, you're going to also have to factor in the effects of (presumably) thousands of years of culture, vs barely four centuries in a rapidly developed melting pot of capitalism.
But this is a lot we're typing out in response to one person's weird conjecture. My point is that I think it's distasteful for someone from Texas to be giving a blanket statement that people from New York must be horrible people. If they spent any time in New York, with New Yorkers, I would hope they'd have a more informed view.
People there are admirably hard workers. They don’t beg. They’ll do all kinds of itinerant and odd jobs but they don’t panhandle.
Thankfully I haven’t been to a Tesco in as long as I can remember where the trolleys have been coin locked.
Coin locks were made for a different era. When everything is contactless, there’s little reason to carry cash. If you aren’t paying for things in cash, you don’t have change you can use for a trolley either.
At least with Sains', if you ask the security guard near the door he'll unlock one for you anyway :)
The only exception to that is wheels that auto-lock to stop you stealing the cart when they cross over the property line of the shop (and they then require manual unlocking).
I suspect US cart designs are just bad...
The last three trollies I've used all had sticking wheels. Waitrose and Tesco. And many times before. And I regularly have the same problem in France.
But yes, auto locking wheels are universally worse.
And I frequently do because I HATE german supermarkets anyway!
The only thing that pisses me off is that Lidl and Aldi don't have baskets. In fact my local Lidl had an absurd short-lived policy that you aren't allowed in the shop unless you get a shopping cart! Thankfully they came to their senses. I just use my shopping bag as a basket.
Just in general not a fan of german food products.
There are two large Sainsbury's supermarkets near me - one is right next to a university and suffers from students taking the trolleys back to their student accommodation - these have a coin.
Then there's another in a more affluent suburb - no coin.
What do you think, a seed round valuation of 50 million for that idea should be ok? More? The addresable market is beyond HUGE!
Pah. That's so 1800's. Modern times would be face* and retinal* scan, plus matching DNA* sample for good measure.
---
* With the expected Terms of Service stating they're allowed to do whatever the hell they want with the data.
Plus, since every cart is matched to a person, no more vandalism or theft!
And make usage of carts mandatory ( door will not open.... )
But only one reserve I have: the carts have to be powered for connectiviy and the electric unlock mechanism. So they could be more expensive. But then let's add an ad screen ( E-Ink! ) on the front inside and have this solve the increase.
Hold on,ehat if the carts' screen could look inside the frudges and display the content? Augmented reality like? We just to figure out a way to make it all AI powered or something!
I am not asking a lot, but if someone rolls with it, please, please don't deploy it anywhere near me! :-)
Aside, this is why HN still is a a great place online!
It's a greasy, screechy trash bin-walker hybrid full of food.