USGS Historical Topographic Maps
esri.com
esri.com
He told us that Google is 100% to blame for the cancellation of the USGS topographic maps program. Their management told him "Google is capturing it all now, so we don't need to do it anymore". He hated them with a burning passion because he was told to turn over all of his maps to Google for digitization into Google Maps because they would be shutting down the paper archives that he was in charge of.
He wasn't mad because his job was going away (they were going to reassign him anyway) -- he was mad because he felt that it wasn't right for Google to be in charge of archiving and controlling access to what was public information. He was also mad because Google's maps weren't nearly as good as his.
I hope that guy is still around and happy to see that the topographic maps live on and are freely available now.
The US military, for example, allowed private vendors to own the code and data on which warfare and lives depended, not to mention future integration and updates. The military has learned, and now requires government ownership (at least in many cases), and even open, modular systems to facilitate integration with other vendors.
The manager of the USGS maps group chatted for a minute, bitterly deriding the closure of his unit (in a giant empty room where the conversation was had). No mention of Google specifically, but also no mention of the facts about purely optical and print methods. Their production line was all pre-digital type?
[Edited to remove snark]
To be fair that's not limited to map viewers. A lot of web apps do that. I think finding the right balance is a bit of an art.
Sometimes, an agency is in need of a willing helping hand.
So a lot of us that actually use this stuff love that we can copy that URL at any particular moment. Is there a way to do that and not show up in browser history?
Yes, there is a specific browser API you can use to do that, or an older technique of using the fragment part of the URL for that kind of data.
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/how-do-i-find-download-or-order-to...
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-i-get-bulk-order-usgs-topograp...
The complete set of offline topographic maps in GeoPDF format with embedded satellite image layer (that can be enabled or disabled if your PDF reader can handle layers properly) is ~2.8 Tb.
With GPS and all nowadays it feels like that skill might be lost, but hopefully there are some guys out there daring enough to keep it going to take those of us who dont know out for an adventure
This is the same reason you should know how to make a fire even if you have a stove. I’ve had a stove fail due to dust in the PRV. A fire kept us warm.
Be prepared.
It was a real adventure; we had no idea that the troop leaders were 50 meters away keeping tabs us through night-vision goggles all night.
And mobile apps like Topo Reader and Avenza Maps for iOS will let you load them for live referencing. I just “discovered” this yesterday, by chance.
https://www.usgs.gov/programs/national-geospatial-program/hi...
* All of Logan airport, Winthrop, etc simply didn't exist
* MIT was a mud flat
* South Bay was still a bay, not a shopping center
* Obviously pre-interstate, railroads dominate the transportation focus
* Back Bay has already been filled in. The collection of mini-street grids is apparent in Back Bay and South Boston (Southie).
* The isolation of the Boston peninsula is less apparent at this point. E.g. Paul Revere's "one if by land, two if by sea" for the British heading NW to Lexington.
History of the Topographic Branch (Division) https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1341/pdf/circ_1341.pdf
with all manner of trivia including: U.S. patents issued to U.S. Geological Survey photogrammetrists etc.
Interestingly enough, I ended up discovering some incorrect data in their system as part of my ingestion process 4 months ago and directly worked with the USGS to both report the pipeline errors causing bad output and they were incredibly prompt and open to collaborating on identifying the issue and proper fix (roughly a 2 week turnaround from original report to correction). I honestly wonder if this 1700+ update to the ESRI collection is a direct result of that work because the numbers do roughly align so that would be exciting!
We would have 10x the mapping capabilities and much higher velocity on defense tech without this parasitic company.
Btw, also recently fined for blatant sexism against hundreds of female employees.
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Main_Page
Esri in the cloud is terrible. Geoserver is much better.
Cloud Native Geospatial might break Esri's hold :
The large size and fine detail of a those lithographs are just not reproducible on a portable screen or printout. It's great to have digital versions available to everyone but the originals are works of art.