A fuller explanation why an emotional reaction is often still the apropriate action.
sometimes picking a hill to die on is more about dying than hills.
You're welcome to explain your theory more but I don't think the thumbtacks are lining up on your proverbial corkboard.
> sometimes picking a hill to die on is more about dying than hills.
Microsoft quit being so picky once the DC District Court ordered a company breakup as an antitrust remedy. It's shocking how fast companies can transition from arguing over dying-hills to begging for their life.
also rather offensive that you make such an accusation. you’re incorrect, but will you even admit the assertion made so casually?
it’s important to stop playing silly games of red versus blue from time to time. but carry on.
what star are you from? or would you say the whole circle.