Why do military personnel wear watches upside down?
smithandbradley.com
smithandbradley.com
I have seen people wear their watch "upside down", including made up women in fashionable attire that would be the polar opposite of the rough style the article is portraying. On the contrary, I looked at a few random pictures of soldiers and in most of them the watch worn the standard way, with the face on the outside of the wrist. In fact, I find the "upside down" way more "girly" than "manly", simply because I think I saw more girls do it than men.
For practical reasons, I guess there are advantages to both. But the "protect the watch" argument, I don't really buy it. It is situational. If you have your watch inside your wrist, you bang it when you have your hands on a table, when you pick heavy stuff, it may come in contact with stuff you have on your belt (tools, gun, ...), etc...
I suspect the article is just an ad. They want to sell a watch for "tough guys" and came up with that story.
Look at this £240 tacticool watch we, the authors happen to sell. Meanwhile when I was in we all wore the disposable £5 casio you could get from Argos an didn't care if it got smashed up
WW1 trench watches had a utility - time of the attacks were timed and they had no radios. With the invent of portable radios and communication equipment, utility of wrist watch to start military operations significantly diminished.
With that said, WW1 trench watches were just pocket watches on the wide wrist band. They aren't comfortable to wear in all positions, so I highly doubt that even during WW1, a lot of soldiers would wear their watches upside down.
The whole site reeks of "Chinese-made watch that we slapped our logo on", with some tacti-cool sprinkled on top. This article in particular is a little too "just so" for my tastes.
But my main objection is that I've known folks that were in the military (and not having served myself), and of the ones I currently know (and therefore, can trust my memory), not a one wears their watch on the inside.
But we've got plenty of military folk on HN, I welcome being corrected.
The real reason: if you ask me the time when I'm holding a pint, I'll pour my drink on you, not me (this was the punchline in an old British comedy sketch I can't find a reference to now).
Nothing about wearing it "upside down" and not sure I know what that means. Before cell phones became the new standard timepiece, pretty sure I wore my watch on the inside of my wrist and see no reason to think there is a "correct" way for it to face. Back of the wrist or inside of the wrist seems like arbitrary personal preference to me.
The reason I did it is whilst lying down or in very confined/concealed area it’s easier to turn your wrist to see the time, which passes amazingly slowly in these situations. If you imagine you arm outstretched in front of you it’s a lot easier to see the watch face if it’s on the inside of the wrist as you have to turn your arm much less.
I’m not sure I am explaining it adequately, but it these circumstances it’s definitely easier.
At all other times and in my normal role I never did this.
Regarding light discipline, many brands make military versions that are much harder to accidentally press the backlight or in modern tomes allow you to turn off the heartrate monitor lights. Also, we would generally wear long sleeves which would cover a watch in most situations anyway, even in hot climates. There was a gradual mover to 3/4 length or turned up sleeves during my time, when watches would then often then get covered by tactical gloves or sometimes even dedicated covers made to conceal a watch.
I would call it wearing it on the inside of the wrist.
I didn't think it had anything to do with the military. I've always worn my watches this way.
In my opinion it's simply a more natural movement to view the face of the watch.
I know others who do it too who aren't associated with the military at all.
1. Prevent the glass from getting scratched and shattered during movements.
2. Glass is reflective and the glint can make you stand out.
3. Reduce accidental button presses.
4. Easier to push out the arm and see the time when a rifle is being held in an aiming position.
5. Cultural reinforcement.
Not everyone does it, not even in high-speed units.
Here's an example of an issued 'military watch' from from 1956:
https://thewatchspotblog.com/bulova-mil-w-3818a-bulova-cal-1...
It's only 32mm in diameter, compared to the advertised Smith and Bradley 'designed to be worn inside' which is 42mm, or the 'standard' size Garmin Fenix which 47mm. Many modern G-Shocks are larger still.
I also like being able to glance down at my wrist and see the time. My wrist is rarely in the proper orientation for this to be possible if I were wearing my watch on the inside.
Lastly, I wonder if "raise to wake" would work in this orientation? It seems not to on my Garmin.
That's a wide movement! Maybe they can learn some "arm discipline" to avoid doubling your width when reading the time?
Number seems exaggerated, but just now I tried both twists (no watch.)
Turning wrist away definitely requires less movement. More comfortable too.
1. To ensure fancy watches do not get damaged/scuffed while traveling on subways
2. To hide fancy watches when riding on subways where watch might signal me as a robbery target
Now, I just use Apple Watch and everything else sits in a locker. Sad.
If she had too many cases close to the end of her shift, she'd have to drive home buzzed on chloroform fumes.
* https://www.amazon.com/Second-Hanging-Stethoscope-Doctors-Si...
It's nice to know when sunset is happening when you're outside, after all.
2) It keeps people from craning to try to sneak a peek at the time. (very irritating. can't a person just ask? anyways this is pre-smartphone era)
Seiko diving watches and some others move the crown to the 4 o-clock position where it's slightly less exposed:
https://www.chronopolis.co.uk/blogs/news/the-8-best-watches-...
Some watches move the crown to the left side, like the Sinn EZM 3: