Hacker News Reader

I'd like to point out that Guix is closer to ~52,000 packages than the ~29,000, as we maintain a bunch of things in separate channels that nixpkgs includes in its monorepo (e.g. the 20+k CRAN packages). See https://hpc.guix.info/channels and https://hpc.guix.info/channels/non-free for some popular channels used by HPC folks.

View on HN

Huh. I think that info should be more prominently displayed.

Just a few minutes ago, I decided to put off trying guix until later because it had fewer packages than nix, and was missing several that I need, that nix has.

Guix even comes with a Nix service[0] which is easy to enable if you would like to also use Nix packages.

[0] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Miscellaneous-Servi...

Nix also has a Guix service itself[^1], if you want to do the same in reverse ;)

[^1]: https://search.nixos.org/options?query=services.guix

I love that this goes both ways. What other pair of Linux distros mutually offer first class support for using each other's package managers alongside their own??

It's a cute little testament to the fundamental strengths of the functional package management paradigm, as well as helping users on either side of the fence fill some gaps in a pinch and providing more/easier opportunities to compare notes and inspire improvements.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com