In Silicon Valley, Millionaires Who Don't Feel Rich
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I suspect Silicon Valley, like New York, is home to an over abundance of the latter kind. While at the same time, those who can't understand continuing to work like that despite having millions, are exactly those that would never have bothered putting in the effort to get millions in the first place.
Once you go beyond these 'legends', to the, I believe, much larger group of people described in the article, this no longer seems to hold, though. The "legends'" possibly inadvertent, yet widely publicized, financial success, seems to have drawn to The Valley many more that ARE in it for the money, and these are the ones I doubt will ever be content.
I would think that having a lot of money would give you the freedom to choose your work, and the ability to wake up every day and work on something you feel passionate about would make you happier. I guess you could say that you don't need a lot of money to do that. But it would make it easier.
I suspect people who work 60 hour workweeks have a tougher time supporting their children (emotionally, not financially), but stay-at-home parents also have trouble setting examples for their kids. It's all a tradeoff.
And it has a reciprocal effect. When a major component of life, one's house, costs five times more, that depresses the wealth effect. When you're living among the super-rich, same thing. If these folks were living in Buffalo, they would be so acutely aware that they were exceptionally rich you wouldn't expect them to have anything to strive for. So there's a lack of a sense of privilege.
But it's also interesting to see the cavalier attitude toward wealth that it engenders. To be the richest fellow in town and still strive for "just a little bit more" requires a rare mindset. But yeah, stick a multi-millionaire in a suburb of super-millionaires and golly, what's a couple million bucks? Not much. I mean, it's not like you're going to quit your job or anything.
Then figure out how much you'd have to work to achieve it. In most cases, it takes less than a full-time median wage 52 . 40 . 16, meaning I could do them working far less than full-time.
"making it" is a state of mind. As is striving to reach an amorphous goal. Happiness research is perhaps some of the most useless work in economics because self reporting is so iffy.
If people don't feel rich, it has nothing to do with their absolute level of material comfort. Almost everyone alive today is far more rich than all other humans that have ever lived.
Happiness is creating new things, and to the extent that money enables this, it makes us happy.
(Not that that would make me choose to be single, though.)
If you gave me 10M tomorrow, I would still work my ass off to someday become rich.
I would hate to be enslaved by my money because I'm supposed to be relaxing just because I have a certain amount of it.
If only I were unhappy with millions of dollars.
In Silicon Valley you'll blow your money on a huge house, a plastic wife, and kids who want a BMW the moment they can drive. Oh, and don't forget the taxes.