These days you cannot tell though. All pilots fly the same - I'm sure they use less fuel which is a big deal to the airlines. I'm guessing they are all using the computer to do the flying. which isn't to say they are using auto land, just there are other things in control ensuring they don't do the fuel wasting things anymore.
The US Air force is the worlds largest air force. The US Navy is second largest. While it is possible to learn to fly in ways other than joining one of the above two (Marines, Army, Coast guard, or private schools), they together train much less pilots and so odds are I never had one. I wouldn't have been able to tell these others from an air force pilot most likely.
I also used to have like a detailed chronological knowledge of the general troop movements and major battles of the civil war, and now I can barely remember that Gettysburg was after both Bull Runs, and that the first battle was just some Union dudes holed up in a fort getting shelled for days somewhere in the south off the coast. I can't remember what state even, lol.
Reading books
Thought it cool when I found it, fired up a random flightsim, it works. It's just better. Even takes off mental loads. I can't speak to actual, human carrying flights, but for sim hobbies I'd "recommend" sticking to this method.
e: forgot to add back disclaimer - am not a pilot any shape or form
https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/geophysical-survey-airplan...
They're not all as high and angled as the image above.
But drones fly, and this is a drone.
But when sensors fail they relinquish control to the pilot. Adding additional sensors could reduce the need for human backup - I wonder if this company added extra redundancy.
edit: found it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkzVMZFWduc
The problems come when you have engines out, landing gear issues, or malfunctioning equipment.
Look at the recent Waymo accidents. Two Waymo vehicles ran into a vehicle being towed backwards. An edge case that a human could have easily avoided, but software couldn’t.
The complexity of flying an airplane autonomously is way lower than for a car.
The biggest reduction comes from there being (almost) no morons in airspace. Planes are expensive, pilot school is expensive, so the chance of encountering someone doing something they're not supposed to do is way lower - in a car, you have to deal with anything from random little children jumping onto the streets over drunk/tired/phone-using drivers to construction sites.
Then there is the requirement of planes to carry ADS-B transmitters in many airspace classes, so planes precisely know where they are and where everyone else is. And distance between planes is also way larger, which makes avoidance easier.
Basically, as long as the aircraft itself is working fine, everything from takeoff to landing can be done autonomously - and appropriate systems have been developed and used for decades, the first CAT 3 autoland capable aircraft arrived in the late 60s [1]. The only two unsolved challenges are taxiing and in-flight equipment failure... the former can be solved by having a tug pick up a plane on the runway, it's only the failure cases that are a real headache because, at least for now, that requires having highly trained pilots on board.
"SkyNet: We do logistics!"
The plane isn't magic, you need to beam specific radio signals at it, from the ground, so it knows what to do.
Take out the humans and add remote piloting and they'll be flying bombs just waiting for hackers to take control of them.