>"Gemini 1.5 Pro (...) matches or surpasses Gemini 1.0 Ultra’s state-of-the-art performance across a broad set of benchmarks."
So Pro is better than Ultra, but only if the version numbers are higher?
So Pro is better than Ultra, but only if the version numbers are higher?
The Nano < Pro < Ultra is an in-revision thing. For their LLMs it's a size thing. Then there's newer releases of Nano, Pro, and Ultra. Some Pro might be better than some older Ultra.
A lot of people seem confused about this but it feels so easy to understand that it's confusing to me that anyone could have trouble.