If you are a police officer and see a guy clearly pointing a gun at someone else through the window, yes, you can break in if the circumstances warrant that.
It was used many times during the pandemic: when they suspected you were having too many people over at home, they acted. Unconstitutionally, mind you.
The EU is not the utopia many think it is.
I'm not keen on written constitutions, or constitutional courts <cough US Supremes>.
In any case I hope we can agree that it's good that they said that restricting our constitutional right to free movement was illegal, even if it had no consequences for those who violated our basic rights so blatantly.
I don't know what that has to do with free movement, nor how that's related to the imprisoned politicians.
FWIW, I don't accept the notion of "human rights" - there are in reality only those privileges that are actually granted. I would like it if there were some kind of universally-accepted set of rights; but only if they are congruent with my own views about what "rights" should look like.
And this was not a case of a violation of "human rights", in which I also do not believe. During the pandemic, there was a flagrant violation of our constitutional rights, among them, the right to free movement (which very roughly means, as a Spanish citizen, I can go anywhere in Spain, whenever I want) and free assembly. The constitutional court makes sure that the constitution has teeth, or so they should.