For me, it's a good argument against conspiracy theories. There's no way there could be secretive organisations running for years and controlling the world without screwing up in stupid and obvious ways.
For me, it's a good argument against conspiracy theories. There's no way there could be secretive organisations running for years and controlling the world without screwing up in stupid and obvious ways.
I like the meta conspiracy theory that the only organizations running without chaos are covert ones though.
There are also natural long term aligned players who conspire in ways that they can use their energy for their benefit. “Market makers”
There are also random alignments that appear to be conspiracies ex post facto.
This take makes sense to me. It's not the org as a whole that is accomplishing secret aims, but a sub-org within a chaotic org, or spread across multiple chaotic orgs, that is able to do so since no one is paying close attention to anything.