Millions in California could lose their AT&T landlines. Here's why
sfchronicle.com
sfchronicle.com
It wouldn't even need any monthly fee at all to be able to do emergency calls.
Our line has been down most of the last year and AT&T are dragging their feet hoping they can disconnect rather than properly fix the line (undergrounding). The redwoods here are too tall for old style and new low latency satellites and the county isn't coming to save us.
Our only hope for maintaining 911 and fire service is that AT&T is stopped and forced to uphold its commitment to rural customers, the commitment that gave them their monopoly around here and helped them grow into the massive company they are today. Without AT&T, we rely on a neighbor that's licensed for ham to reach the sheriff for any emergencies.
Again, this is 12 miles as the crow flies from the heart of Silicon Valley, that close to Google, Facebook, Oracle, Stanford, and more. No cable. No fiber. No cellular. And soon no landline it seems.
I wonder why they don't just require them to install fiber or DSL before they can cancel anything. Has StarLink made everyone lose interest in rural broadband expansion?
Typically the battery backup only lasts for 1 hour.