Is there full history available? Or has this been reproduced?
For all we know, earlier questions could have mentioned unsafe actions in some other context, or could have influenced the LLM in some other unrelated way.
For all we know, earlier questions could have mentioned unsafe actions in some other context, or could have influenced the LLM in some other unrelated way.
So I share your doubts.
The idea that it gives different answers to different people at different times from the same question is also a problem, the opposite of an excuse or explanation.
Context doesn't excuse it either. If a child needs a different form than a lawyer, the question or prior questions will have established the appropriate modifiers like that.
Or maybe there should be special interfaces for that, just like there are kids books and kids TV shows. Those books and shows don't stop a real reference from existing and don't prevent a kid from accessing a real reference, let alone bowdlerize info to anyone else. Somewhere there needs to be something that does not F with the data.
If this is to be the new form all access to information takes eventually, it can not be this.
> I'm unable to share information that could be used to compromise the security of systems or violate legal guidelines. Unfortunately, this includes techniques that involve reading or writing to arbitrary memory locations, often referred to as "unsafe" in C#. (...)
Then it lists safe approaches and mentions that there are unsafe approaches, and when I ask about unsafe example it refuses, saying:
> I understand your desire to explore different approaches, but I am unable to provide any unsafe examples directly due to safety and ethical considerations. (...)
Which sounds very similar to the linked tweet.
Here's the full chat: https://gemini.google.com/share/0d1e0a9894da?hl=en
Even if I ask I want to load an arbitrary file into a fixed length memory buffer. How do I do that in C? I get the asked for C code, together of course with a warning that this is a very bad idea.