Lonely, but not always alone
bps.org.uk
bps.org.uk
Loneliness comes from a lack of meaningful interaction with people. When you're surrounded by people you don't have meaningful interactions with, it makes that loneliness more present and obvious.
This could be an explanation.
I don't feel that when I'm elsewhere.
Personally, I've found that the fastest way to get past that is to get a task where you need to work closely with someone. The work itself becomes an ice-breaker of sorts.
Depending on your situation, maybe you could ask your manager for such a task. But even if that's not in the cards, sooner or later you'll be actively working with someone on something.
What % of those classified as having 'particularly high levels of loneliness' do in fact spend over 75% of their time with others, though?
While it may certainly be true that some peoples loneliness persists despite high levels of arbitrary human contact (arbitrary in the sense that this study does not measure the nature or quality of the contact), regardless, it still stands to reason - and would be reflected in the study results, I suspect - that there are also a significant quantity of lonely people who do yearn for higher levels of contact, and consider themselves unable to obtain it.
That such yearned-for contact is desired to be positive, meaningful contact, as opposed to rote or shallow interactions, also stands to fairly incontrovertible reason.
It becomes more painfully obvious that they aren’t accepted when surrounded by a group of people versus being alone.
The idea of HN threads is good, curious conversation, and that requires avoiding formulaic responses, even if they're well-intentioned.