Chinese migrants are fastest growing group crossing into U.S. from Mexico [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
Are people illegally coming into a country going to then obey its rules and follow its laws?
I’m not super comfortable with it either, but it seems to be a country where opportunity is placed above the law.
> 4. Naughtiness
> Though the most successful founders are usually good people, they tend to have a piratical gleam in their eye. They're not Goody Two-Shoes type good. Morally, they care about getting the big questions right, but not about observing proprieties. That's why I'd use the word naughty rather than evil. They delight in breaking rules, but not rules that matter. This quality may be redundant though; it may be implied by imagination.
> Sam Altman of Loopt is one of the most successful alumni, so we asked him what question we could put on the Y Combinator application that would help us discover more people like him. He said to ask about a time when they'd hacked something to their advantage—hacked in the sense of beating the system, not breaking into computers. It has become one of the questions we pay most attention to when judging applications.
I will say that I don't think the situation is being handled all that well (and I suppose hasn't for decades, but perhaps that just goes to show that there's not much we can do at all), but as a resident of South Texas, I haven't felt any actual problems with my day-to-day life that I can directly attribute to illegal immigration.
I thought my post was unambiguous. Powerful, successful people (like pg and sama) clearly don't believe the rules apply to them.
No, the more people that we let in like that, the more this country turns into that. I'm not signed up for that.
I think both parties are pretty awful on immigration, it’s crazy we still have such a broken system, and that video shows something has to be done. On this everyone can agree, so the question is why isn’t it happening?
I hate a lot of things the Republicans do. But on NPR (!!) there was a program where they described how Biden restricted asylum in ways where Trump had failed. i think they had interviewed someone who worked in a border facility.
Trump tried to block asylum applications (struck down as unconstitutional), the Biden administration merely found ways to block acceptance instead.
I kept waiting for the catch that explained why it wasn’t as bad as they portrayed — there was none. They didn’t seem biased, there was just no redeeming factor here.
I’m not going to claim then border crossing crowding issue is easy to solve or simple in any way.
However, it does start to feel like a lot of sensitive political issues are just chess pieces…
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2023/02/21/fact-sheet-notice-propos...