No shiny AR or "spatial computing" distractions. Just visibility.
That would be incredibly useful, and cool.
Christ the people on the website are just another level.
The people driving today with the headset (even for the memes) are the insane ones. It does not have the FOV for you to be fully aware of the road (I've used one in-store). I've also heard that even 12ms is apparently still too much latency for a driver to react promptly to emergencies.
As another user of the road do I get a say in this as well besides Apple and the moron with their headset on?
This is one of the dumbest things that you could possibly do, a heads up display I can get behind assuming it is very much limited in how much information can be displayed but a device that utterly obscures your vision, removes your peripheral vision and replaces it with a screen that isn't necessarily pointing in the direction that your head is pointing in whilst driving a vehicle sounds like an excellent way to have a serious accident. I do hope it is a one sided one, this is Darwin award level stuff.
Your glass windshield doesn't need a source of power to stay transparent, but Vision Pro does.
I absolutely do not believe that the current iteration of the product should ever be used while operating a moving vehicle. You are right to call it dumb.
Software or hardware glitch. Or power glitch.
R1 runs an RTOS, though, passthrough continues to run even if the main processor (the M2) completely crashes. So it already seems to try to fail safe. I can't imagine that's by accident. Maybe it's not that they're going to use the Vision Pro in these situations, but that maybe they might use the R1 or a future generation of it for their self-driving cars.
running from the inevitable only makes you tired.