A blog post can be sufficient reference.
The point is that Wikipedia isn't original research. You updating the page on the basis of personal knowledge isn't the way it is supposed to work.
The point is that Wikipedia isn't original research. You updating the page on the basis of personal knowledge isn't the way it is supposed to work.
Was reverted as that was not reference to some book or sciene article.
Never contributed after that. May be one or 2 graph theory improvements.
Wiki denies realitity.
And for math i use only 10% of my math requests.
- Thing done
- Editor makes a judgement call
- Turns out to be a bad call
- Editor refuses to admit mistake
- Things escalate