Kinda ironic that you call this "racism against white" by subtly saying that non economically profitable neighbourhoods are non white.
Those proposed changes are not racist, they are simply and blindly anti-poor.
Those proposed changes are not racist, they are simply and blindly anti-poor.
GP is saying that white non-economically-profitable neighbourhoods get no protection from that rule.
Also not if, for example, an ISP decides to expand to a minority area instead of a white area because of DEI policies.
In theory that should also be forbidden by the rule against racial discrimination, but in practice it's often not enforced that way.