The problem is its difficult to track what ChatGPT can and can't do. One day it'll give you junk and then an update or different prompt might fix that problem.
I think of ChatGPT like a pretty smart co-worker. Just because they are smart doesn't mean they are always right.
Don't trust it further than that.
Trusting it blindly is stupid. But, so is trusting any sources without verification.
What I mean in relation to the post is that it's hard to even make a question that ChatGPT will fail destructively without doing a lot of research in advance. In many cases, even if it fails, it'll have a reasonable mistake that a normal human might make -- and a normal interviewer doesn't have the time to fine tune, craft, and research how to mess up an AI