The core problem with interviews is that it's basically impossible to tell how well someone's going to perform on the job. It's always possible to grind leetcode or whatever and make it look like you know what you're talking about, by using the model people can just skip that part entirely.

Not to mention the fact that some interviewers feel obliged to ask useless cliche questions like "why do you think you are a good fit for this position" yada yada.

Not going to be surprised if picking people based on random chance (if they meet basic requirements) is going to actually be better statistically than bombarding them with questions trying to determine if they are good enough. Really feels like we are trying to find a pattern in randomness at that point.

Bottom line is that if ChatGPT is actually a problem for the interview process, then the process is just broken.