I'm positive people want their databases to be correct. There are databases which promise great speed in return for occasionally losing bits of your data, and they get very little use outside of special uses.
Exactly; people would like their databases to be correct and consistent, but generally don't care enough to actually do something like hiring someone like Kyle to verify it before buying a database. They just find something with the right features and performance, and go ahead and use it. You see a lot of them in this thread; people who used RavenDB for a while, and then had to migrate away because of issues. If the business actually cared enough about consistency, there would have been some kind of validation and verification before selecting a database.