> The idea that the company has underperformed for the last 10 years ... is a joke
Did you even read the Triad Partners quote from their letter? It's their words, not mine.
Did you even read the Triad Partners quote from their letter? It's their words, not mine.
"Earnings per share (“EPS”) in the most recent fiscal year were lower than the EPS generated by Disney a decade ago"
is not the same as "underpeforming for a decade".
all that says is that EPS is currently low, not that it has been low and reducing/stagnant for a decade.
> Disney shareholders were once over $200 billion wealthier than they are now
Is that an exaggeration?
https://filmthreat.com/news/male-and-pale-is-stale-responses...
As a result, the money generated by the industry has seen a
remarkably noticeable drop. The rise of the term “flop buster”
(in response to so many films like Indiana Jones and the
Dial of Destiny underperforming at the box office) seems to
be directly related to mainstream audiences’ wholesale rejection
of the over-messaging they see hijacking entertainment.
addresses your "it's just nature of Box Office" flopping argument