+1 for practical paranoia!
Operators lie.
I am speaking from experience. I have tested this, and always got the same answer.
He didn't corrupt the BBC announcers, they just both worked for the government.
(..so also excellent time to scam me.. please don't. But also maybe more fruitful just to steal the baggage if you have access to that information.)
I think if you somehow have access to the lost baggage at a given airport, theft is going to me profitable than scamming. Aaanyway!
Tragic story
When I briefly was interested in precious metals, I found that a popular gold&silver bullion retailer had a breach, with attacker having customer contact info, and also able to email as the retailer.
This seemed like a situation with higher-stakes risks than the usual applications of consumer data breaches.[1]
So I felt obligated to alert them.
When I talked my way through the company's main phone number, the IT/security people came off as skeptical of me, and kinda doing a tough-guy thing (like they might be dealing with an attacker trying to social them, and didn't want to show weakness or look stupid), before they acknowledged/claimed that they knew about the compromise.
Then, when they realized I was legitimately alerting them, not trying to trick them, nor to otherwise get anything from them, they still sounded like I was a jerk for bothering them about this compromise they already knew about. (Though I don't think they disclosed it to affected customers.)
I suppose I should be understanding, that they might get BS calls all the time, but, even as a ordinary citizen trying to be helpful, the tone was annoying. I guess the FBI would be rolling their eyes even harder at companies that not only can't do their job of securing sensitive data and systems, but then act like jerks when you try to help them salvage the inevitable fudge-up.
[1] This was a vendor to the "if you don't hold it, you don't own it" physical gold&silver buyers fad at the time. If attacker also got the shipping addresses, it's a high-value burglary target list, of homes with high probability of untraceable stores-of-wealth, including ones that could easily be liquidated for (today) around $2,000 per troy ounce. Or the worse variant: target list for home invasion, where badguy threatens/tortures occupants until confident that the victim told them all the hiding locations, not just the decoy safe. Maybe a harder list to sell for that purpose, but more dangerous if it got used for that purpose (rather than, or in addition to, an email scam gold-for-Bitcoin special offer that appeared to be from the retailer and got past spam filters).
Prime example: everyone at my company received an email about some mandatory training and it was from an unusual source (compared to previous mandatory trainings). The VP that set it all up sent a follow-up email telling us that he was very proud of us for being “diligent,” but that the training was legit and indeed still mandatory.
Technically? All of them. The FBI rarely allows its agents to appear on TV shows.