Milwaukee reporter investigates cousin's 1978 car bombing death
jsonline.com
jsonline.com
The other interesting thing about this is I had no recollection of organized crime or any of these names having grown up around the city and now living downtown. Is it my fault for not ever wanting to know about the history of the city I grew up in? Or has society changed what it considers interested to where people don't really care about recent local pasts?
These sort of stories are really the thing I hope gets emphasized in the future of local news. Longer stories about people, both from the past but also in the current. Automation with AI generated news can't help become a thing, and hopefully this means more emphasis is put on reporters doing fuller stories, news stories, not news facts.
This is a story not only about the crime scene in Milwaukee ~50 years ago, but also the story of how the author learned about it and how it affects her. In fact, it's less of a story about a crime, and more of a story about what someone had to do in this age to try to understand more about what happened before.
Which is interesting, because so many people (especially abroad) seem to think the area is defined by mafia-type organized crime. I was in a thread a few months back with someone who brought Frank Nitti into an argument about crime in Chicago!
The most interesting thing about the MKE story here is the connection to the movie Casino.
That being said, the Mexican cartels operate in a big way in Chicago. Every cartel case anywhere has Chicago connections.
Europeans associate Chicago with Al Capone. It's because the Chicago Outfit became a popular worldwide genre, like Westerns or science fiction. Germans were almost more into Westerns than Americans were.
I'm not clear on what you mean. Surely there are gangs, many of them organized along family or ethnic lines, that control the typical crime markets like the drug trade. It may not be Italian-Americans, but there's plenty of other groups in such a large city.
Maybe they are more fragmented, but they are still basically made of full-time criminals who know each other and use violence to contest the market. In terms of scale, the industry is big enough that people specialize (import / distribution / money-laundering / etc) and so there's an economy requiring its own version of a justice system (aka negotiations, violence).
Isn't that pretty much the same as the mafia?
(typo edited)
In terms of pop culture, The Godfather came out in the 1970s!
Anyway, Joseph Valachi and others turning states witness in the 60s broke down much of the secrecy. The RICO act was enacted in 1970 primarily to go after the mafia and led to numerous prosecutions over the next 20 years. If you lived in a large city you were aware of what was going on, and if not you heard about it on the evening news.
> Mafia was a very secretive organization.
The organizational structure and operations may have been secretive obviously but obviously they couldn't operate a large business if they were completely a secret.
Allegations that the 1960 presidential election was rigged by the mob were made at the time.
You'll note that this sentence of yours does not specify "mafia-type organized crime", so when someone replies about the relevance of what you did specify, organized crime, its a pretty clear line. :)
When did that happen? I have a buddy of mine who attends community action groups run by local alderman out of churches on the south side. As of maybe 2017 he was telling me about how "The Machine" was alive and well and aldermen were still afraid to speak out about it (even if they move across the country afterward).
I'm sure there's a lot of graft and corruption. There is everywhere we have single-party rule. But the "Democratic Machine" is not an Outfit-style criminal organization.
The conflict between mob and police seems to have gradually resolved into organized crime as policing.
I ran a music newspaper in Milwaukee in the early 80s (the Express, still in business after all these years as the Shepherd Express). Our advertisers were bars and clubs. One club that wasn't very popular underwent extensive renovation frequently, changing themes from urban cowboy to disco to hard rock, and other club owners said it was a scheme to launder Las Vegas syndicate money. I went to sell advertising to the club owner and he memorably greeted me by saying, "You may be the apple of your mother's eye but you are nothing but a tiny speck of shit to me." After I established that my business partner was best friends in law school with the fiancee of his nephew the dentist and audaciously pitched a full-page ad, he amicably agreed to run a 1/8 page ad every month as long as I never bothered him again.
I never ran into anything resembling organized crime. But then again I don’t know of ninepins have recognized irbid I saw it.
You good?
It’s surprising to hear that the prosecutor was permitted to keep all these documents for himself. No explanation is given in the article about whether this is legal.
(*) If he kept the only copy, that's even worse since a new prosecutor wouldn't have access to the old records if they wanted to pursue a new prosecution or if there was an appeal to an old case.
> prosecutor already had access to them
I don't think that argument works. The same could be said for a software engineer. He had access to the source code, so why can't he keep a copy of it?
Even in Italy, where people were still dying in the streets in certain areas in the early 2000s, most cartels have moved on from drugs and prostitution to public works, property development, hospitality etc. The street stuff is now left largely to foreign gangs who have nothing to lose.
"It's over for the little guy."
Nowadays, crime is much smaller and more ephemeral, which is good for criminals. They can get away with walking into an establishment and walking out with whatever they like. Most of the time with no problems at all. I think I prefer that to errant car bombs.
Once upon a time, the mafia was big in Milwaukee. They killed this reporter's cousin. I think that's a fine summary.
Easier to see if payoff is worth it or if you're reading a recipe-like essay. Honestly, this is pretty normal stuff. No reason to be offended. It's not a personal request to you specifically.
It's more a reading-for-enjoyment kind of story than a trying-to-educate-you kind of story. The only thing you really missed was some potential enjoyment.