Hacker News Reader

Hi Rasbt, thanks for writing the new guide and the upcoming book on LLM, another must buy book from Manning.

Just wondering are going to include any specific section or chapter in your LLM book on RAG? I think it will be very much a welcome addition for the build your own LLM crowd.

View on HN

This is a good point. It's currently not in the TOC, but I may add this as supplementary text.

Semi-related, as long as we're requesting things: to @pr337h4m's point above, it would be interesting to have some rough guidance (even a sidebar or single paragraph) on when it makes sense to pre-train a new foundation model vs finetune vs pass in extra context (RAG). Clients of all sizes—from Fortune 100 to small businesses—are asking us this question.

That's a good point. I may briefly mention RAG-like systems and add some literature references on this, but I am bit hesitant to give general advice because it's heavily project-dependent in my opinion. It usually also comes down in what form the client has the data and whether referencing from a database or documentation is desired or not. The focus of chapter 6+7 is also instruction-finetuning and alignment rather than finetuning for knowledge. The latter goal is best achieved done via pretraining (as opposed to finetuning) imho. In any case, I just read this interesting case study last week on Finetuning vs RAG that might come in handy: "RAG vs Fine-tuning: Pipelines, Tradeoffs, and a Case Study on Agriculture" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08406)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com