Hacker News Reader

Comment by thrdbndndn | Hacker News Reader

It looks to me that they're spinning than rotating; in other words, rotate around an axis that is perpendicular to the ground, instead of parallel to the ground.

And because of this, the person above is stepping on the "spinning surface" (the "base" surface of a cylinder) of these tiny disks, instead of the curved surface like a normal wheel or some industrial conveyor wheels (as someone linked below, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRS0Uj2WdpA ).

So in a sense, they're not "rotating like rotating wheels" despite being wheels/disks.

BTW, it looks like they also can adjust its axis angle slightly (less than 30 degree), which I imagine is also crucial to how it works.

View on HN

Yep, and by tilting the spinning discs/cylinders you can have omnidirectional control by changing which part of the edge of the rotating cylinder is in contact with the surface above it. You don't need the ultrasound thing posted in the other comment, that patent may be a different path they've also tried.

Yeah, I think this is right too. It'd also explain the sound.

Feels like a very mechanically-simple strategy, but hard to make durable / safe from fingers (and detecting "skin" vs "shoe" doesn't seem like something you can make foolproof) / that would hurt to fall onto.

Society says that progress goes forward. Toes? Not always.

Beautifully simple that it only has to spin the wheels one direction! I do imagine it has to stop though when the person stops walking.

The drawback of this is that it requires a firm contact point like shoes to work. You wouldn't want to walk in socks on this. You also couldn't have a performer lay directly on the surface and transport them across the stage, nor allow them to have baggy clothing near it. Running would be difficult from a balance perspective, not to mention holding a wheel at a particular tilt would require quite a bit of force if someone runs on it. It's going to have a very particular use case for Disney.

That's what I mean. Rotating around their axis, which is spinning. Like the world rotates or spins. And by wheels I also mean disk, probably disks is more precise just as the spinning but really don't see why anyone would be confused when there's a video.

But anyway, thanks for improving my English.

(Text here is removed due to bad wording.)

To mrtksn: yeah I think your original post is pretty clear. But there are indeed other comments in this thread that are confusing the two.

Yeah probably but there's a minutes long video with close ups.

In my mental model its wheels attached in different way that rotate around an axis perpendicular to the ground. I call in wheels because moves the things around.

I'm really confused by the confusion. Isn't it obvious on the video that its cylindrical objects that can be considered thick disks and wouldn't all disks rotate on the round surface around the axis?

I also found the close up video to be self explanatory but I understand the confusion. People are thinking of it as multiple tiny treadmills that change direction rather than the spinning disc it actually is.

English isn't my first language but if it people were referring the motion as spinning instead of rotating and discs instead of wheels it wouldn't be confusing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com