Fluffy and weak article that attempts to shame leadership.

* Implies continuous employment is guaranteed without making that point.

* Misleads the reader to think inaccurately cynically, and actually dumbs-down the reader.

Unanswered questions:

- How many Tech layoffs are from Public (stock market) companies vs Private? The article waffles, talks about small and large companies, while not providing profitability measurements for small companies, only the gross word, "RALLY".

- Which sectors are impacted?

- Are Tech layoffs due to a particular set of causes?

The article's title correlates RALLY with LAYOFF ("Don’t tell that to the bosses that they're financially successful.]" -from the article).