We may have enough water for now but we're using it faster than it can be replenished; our reserves in aquifers is starting to run out.
I watched the documentary Day Zero [1] last year about the global water crisis. I highly recommend anyone interested in what's going on with water to watch it. It was one of those oh shit movies where on one hand, you're glad you learned something important and on the other hand, you kinda wish you could have stayed blissfully ignorant because of how scary the situation actually is.
For example, the Ogallala Aquifer [2] covers approximately 174,000 square miles across 8 states—South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. It's one of the largest aquifers in the world.
Of all the water that's extracted from it, only 10% gets replenished. That's obviously not sustainable, especially with climate change, increasing municipal and farming use.
We're not going to desalinate our way out of this all over the world.
What does sustainable mean? It sounds like the implication is that if we go backwards technologically that would somehow be sustainable.
If we doubled down on renewable energy or even nuclear energy and desalination maybe we could increase water consumption and reduce our impact on the environment without any compromises. It’s easy to be a cynic and say we should reduce agricultural output or tell people to have a worse quality of life while giving up on finding solutions, because that viewpoint requires no problem solving or innovation. That isn’t sustainability, it’s the exact opposite.
Desalination is just more waste of energy, it can be part of a solution but shouldn't be the solution. We really need to look into the natural systems we modified/interfered and figure out ways to be much more efficient with them. And that is what usually gets called "sustainable".
It's not being a mennonite, much rather the opposite: be smarter about what we use, extract more from less.
They have ~2 million households[2], and a household uses an average of 3,000 g/m or 36,000 g/y/h or about 80 billion gallons / y for all households.
Huge coincidence, that's pretty close to balanced out.
And yet, we shuffle the rainfall to the ocean and pray for snowpack in the mountains and protest Nestle and Almond farmers.
1. https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%28%2812+inches+*+los+a...
2. https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=households+in+los+angel...
I’m assuming the rest is mostly captured via sewers just to prevent flooding.
A better designed city could capture more.
Going off the great book “Rainwater Harvesting in Drylands & Beyond”