>”I sympathize because there is almost nothing men have traditionally done to distinguish themselves where today there isn't a woman calling herself a girl imitating it with a film crew for instagram, and the underlying message is, "this does not distinguish or provide dignity for you anymore because a girl can do it."”

Not exactly sure what you’re trying to say here. Are you implying that because women can do the same thing as men today that it somehow devalues men doing the same work? That because the same work can be done by a woman, that the work now no longer provides any dignity?

Doubt that many women are pushing the narrative that, “men’s work that women are now able to do is no longer dignified work.”

> "A lot of men are lonely because they lack the ability to put emotions into words, which makes it hard for them to form relationships," Levant says. "The inability to put their emotions into words leads to failures in relationships, leads to loneliness, leads to their seeking out these experiences." I'm glad men are seeking this stuff out, and it's a lot more thought out than it was a decade ago. However, this lens quoted above views men as an inferior form of woman and it's too patronizing to engage.

The author is pointing out that some of these men might need help communicating in order to sustain a long term relationship not that “[men are] an inferior form of a woman.” What is that even supposed to mean?