Jar Jar Binks: The greatest thing that ever happened to Star Wars
ilovejarjarbinks.tripod.com
ilovejarjarbinks.tripod.com
https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/3qvj6w/theory_jar...
Maybe it was the new movies that made us realize how much worse they could have been.
It's better than the alternate realities that many experience. ;)
Star Wars got self-indulgent after she left.
There must have been a sort of magic there, something greater than the sum of its parts, but that's true for an awful lot of great films. There's always some great unexplainable They seem to happen by accident, by lucky intervention from a gifted cast, by a once-in-a-century musical agglomeration, by a herculean labor of love from everyone concerned, through the titanic efforts of singular madmen (who often become as much of a story as the one they are trying to film). The directors we remember are the ones most likely to appear with these miracles on a semi-regular basis. Maybe George and Marcia were one of those thermodynamic miracles, great unexplainables.
But to me, Jar Jar is a singularly unlikable character.
The resurgence of support you see for the prequels is just the kids who saw them at the age appropriate time are now grown up and posting to social media.
Unpopular opinion but I don’t think any of them are particularly good movies but as vehicles for toys and video games they captured the attention of every child
My own kids are growing up with Rebels, Asohka and Rey. The latter is getting a lot of hate right now but I’m sure in a couple decades the support will turn around
I call this the 'SNL effect', as everyone argues that the best cast was the one that happened to be on the air when they first discovered the show.
Although I don't believe in the existence of more than two Star Wars films, George Lucas is not known for writing deep characters. You're not supposed to like Jar-Jar, he's the titular Phantom Menace, and of course he's horrible and no good. No wonder he's always trying to mess everything up and make it look like he's just clumsy. whoops I accidentally convinced the Intergalactic Senate to invest unrestricted emergency powers in my evil friend. Oh darn.
I haven’t seen a tripod/lycos site in the wild in well over a decade
like all good things, people with nothing to live for but money started abusing them...
I've now met so many prequel lovers - some of them people I deeply respect - that I can't chalk it up to dumb, or faulty aesthetics, or hype bandwagoning. I genuinely think there's been a generational shift[0] in how people experience the medium of film. It's a shift that the prequels themselves are no small part of. Blocking, eyelines, camera placement, diegetic/nondiegetic, continuity - these just aren't part of a visual grammar for many among the young and growing part of the population. Although the prequels do make a lot of (really bad) mistakes from a screenplay perspective, you can potentially recover from those with something as simple as camera placement. But the kids don't really care - it's not how the medium speaks to them.
The newer Star Wars films[1], while at least cognizant of the film discipline, do entirely throw continuity into the thunder bucket, make a hash of character motivations, and then, after that, still do freaky, weird, film-school-reject editing. But people love those, too, and again, I think there's that generational thing again.
And I've more or less made my peace with it. But please don't expect me to lavish any kind of praise on the prequels. They are terrible, terrible films. Not the worst films, but close enough to sight without scopes, and certainly the worst films to have such a hype machine attached. Like if LotR came out, and Frodo turned out to be played by Adam Sandler, and Gollum was just really flatulent, and everyone involved suddenly forgot how to make movies all at the same time.
[0] Hanging out with a bunch of undergrads, we watched 1980's The Shining together for Halloween, and - to a man and woman - they were universally bored out of their skins. The movie did not work on these people. That was my "aha!" moment. While I can't prove this, I think that a lot of film basics are obsoleted by the fact that the new generation regards camera position as more or less arbitrary. So a reveal might be just as likely to be frustrating as suspenseful.
[1] With the exception of TFA, which is an absolutely perfectly made soft reboot of ANH. I mean, seriously. It's the same movie, a sleazy cheap move that makes me feel all greasy. I think it's the cynicism of that decision that gave me the bad taste. No, wait, it was when I realized that none of the events of TLJ mattered, at all. None of the characters accomplish anything - the movie did not have to exist. So that was a bad taste too. Still watchable. There's like, a good ninety minute movie hiding in there somewhere. The third one, I just kind of lost track of anything, like watching a compilation of unrelated music videos.
Did MCU not teach you anything, Disney? "Hey, I got a great idea for a Western . ." bam! Logan. "Do you know, what if we had like a cold war paranoia spy movie and . ." bam! Winter Solider. "Dang, so if you have a heist movie, but the twist is we have a shrink ray and . . "bam! Ant-Man. Tie all of 'em up with a McGuffin, a Big Bad, and, ding, instant cinematic universe. See what we did there? We made stories first. It's also, incidentally, what the great Star Wars video games did as well. Even the not-so-great; the elite storm trooper who loses her faith is frickin' amazing (damn, Finn got robbed, screenplay-wise . . also, again, his character does not need to exist . . goddammit, stop wasting my time, Finbro Disney People!).
Probably "Don't Waste Anyone's Time" is a good one sentence screenwriting lesson.
Anyhoosit. Enough grousing from this old fart.