It seems so easy to test that I feel the idea must have some readily apparent flaw.
It seems so easy to test that I feel the idea must have some readily apparent flaw.
The Roman-Gallo dodecahedron was created for the Roman troop arms merchants (Negotiatores) & Auxiliary troop arms officers. It was used to measure, procure & maintain the Roman Auxiliary troop polearm weapon shafts; to ensure standardized specs for the varying Auxiliary troops (they were allowed to use their own weapons which varied by troop origin). This would include the diameter - mid shaft, the taper of the shaft just outside/away from the joint at the weapon head socket & the taper of the wood shaft, just inside the head socket. Seach Quora under my name (Richard Allday) for more info.
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-use-of-the-Roman-dodecahe...
My next thought was that each side held a face-plate, maybe painted wood, that could be pressed in to the face, the knobs would help there. The holes underneath the panels could have been used to just make it weigh less, which could explain the differences in hole sizes found.
There were multiple denominations of Roman coins, and I assume some variance in size at each mint over the centuries. That could explain why each hole is a different size, and why the sizes aren't uniform between each one found.
>... twelve flat pentagonal faces, each face having a circular hole of varying diameter in the middle, the holes connecting to the hollow center.