Ode to Internet – V.90 56k dialup modem handshake for orchestra (1996) [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
There's an interesting reason for that. A digital modulation that is going fast enough, if it is well-designed to make use of a channel, will approximate white noise. A primary frequency or harmonic can be thought of like a "hot spot" and the more relatively powerful it is, the more it will distort the other frequencies. So, an ideal encoding will have constant average power across the entire bandwidth. Essentially, white noise.
Modems got there by the late 1980s with the jump to 9600 bps, when a single bit started being spread out over many symbols using convolutional modulation.
Depends which 56K “standard” you are using. There were two before v90 standardised things, they had different handshake modifications for negotiating the faster link, and v90 was different again. Some ISPs supported only one of the earlier “standards” for some time after v90 (most v90 modems were firmware switchable between it and one of the older methods or were soft-modems where that switch was in the driver).
https://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/computers/hardware/mode...
My understanding is that it required digital equipment at the exchange end which would make it impossible to do with two standard modems wired back to back. Unless someone has some telco kit laying around, it might be a lost sound.
There are other methods but that's the one I would use. To see one of the other methods, try here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ_hWS6ked8
V.90/92: https://goughlui.com/2016/05/03/project-the-definitive-colle...
X2: https://goughlui.com/2018/06/10/project-record-a-us-robotics...
K56Flex: https://goughlui.com/2018/06/10/project-record-a-k56flex-dia...
Turns out I've been trying to track down the USRobotics Sportster voice modem sound from your first link. Even better as I can't find my 56k USRobotics, only the 33.6k one, so probably wouldn't have ever found that sound with hardware either.
Thanks; that's been lodged in my head for a couple of decades.
Your critique falls flat (pun intended) because there is no DTMF here.
Also, this video is a chopped-up edit from a session of real music performance, rather than someone's original composition. Many commenters seem oblivious to this distinction.
It's hard to recognize as not only would do the frequencies of the DTMF standard likely not line up with the fundamentals of the 12-note western scale, but these wind instruments don't produce anything close to a pure sine wave- they have lots of harmonics, and with two of them overlapping it's hard to discern what the phone number was supposed to be.
Twitter, Reddit and HN can sometimes be pretty loud.