The ancient history of 'forgotten crops'
arch.cam.ac.uk
arch.cam.ac.uk
The rest of what they grew back then, has not survived. There was something related to sumpweed, which is like ragweed but with a high-protein seed, similar to a grain. And there was goosefoot, which is rather closely related to quinoa, and the huanzotle of the article from Mexico, which also produces a high-protein seed. And they grew something related to little barley (not that closely related to actual barley) which grows almost everywhere in North America. (If you live in North America you have probably seen it before [1].)
Their wild ancestors/relatives are often considered weeds today. These were not minor crops. Central North America had fields of them, supporting populations in the millions of settled farmers in small villages, for several thousand years. All gone now. The domesticated forms were probably a fair bit different from the wild forms. They may have not made the best crops for various reasons -- given that corn seems to have displaced them all a couple thousand years ago. (The corn monoculture really goes back quite a ways, it seems.)
Something akin to this story likely occurred everywhere agriculture was invented. Probably, the large majority of crops and cultivars that have existed at some time, now do not.
[1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Hordeum_...
2024. Orphan crops of archaeology-based crop history research. Plants, People, Planet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10468
I hadn't ever really considered how hard a problem historical food identification would be. E.g. historical literature says "grain" in local language and dialect, but what specifically does that mean?
Also, related (if more modern) for the US, the search for heritage apples (living trees of many of which still exist throughout Appalachia): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34476820
The Iranian sorghum was the most memorable plant. I had never seen sorghum before then and it is such an interesting plant. I have since developed a love for sorghum and sorghum molasses makes up almost all of my sugar intake these days.
If you have never seen sorghum, imagine 10+ foot tall corn stalks with amaranth heads.
also I didn't know you could make molasses from sorghum. must check that out.
I wasn't aware of sorghum molasses either, but apparently it was the primary source of sugar for much of the southern US for a long time. It's not like cane molasses, it has a much richer taste and is apparently good for you in moderation. Has some minerals and compounds that are hard to find in other foods.
I've had jowar bhakris, which are like rotis made of sorghum flour. they taste okay, not great (imo of course).
I've had bajra bhakris too. bajra is more heating and harder to digest, so better for winter food, but has a more pronounced taste than jowar. it is more dense, so you get full sooner.