Hacker News Reader

Comment by wizerdrobe | Hacker News Reader

Some folks are able to listen to an authority figure and follow through with what is expected no problem.

Some folks might not trust those authority figures and their advice. For those, doing wrong and discovering you don’t like it is a hard won life lesson.

Along a similar line, I’ve heard it say that if you consider yourself a peaceful person but are not actually capable of great violence, then are you actually peaceful or simply harmless? If you’re not capable of doing wrong perhaos you’re not good, simply neutral “robot” entity confined to your programming.

View on HN

> Along a similar line, I’ve heard it say that if you consider yourself a peaceful person but are not actually capable of great violence, then are you actually peaceful or simply harmless?

Why not both peaceful and harmless (for the moment)? This is a function of time. I don't think it's possible to make that statement without supplying the time parameter.

Also, I don't think peaceful people are not capable of great violence. It's about choice. I'm capable of violence, but I choose to not use that capability.

It's not simply a choice. I know that I am capable of terrible things, if pushed. I know because I've done plenty of stuff I am not proud of.

Avoiding guilt, or reprisals, doesn't make me "good".

All this reminded me of this fantastic Stargate SG-1 episode: https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Absolute_Power

> Some folks might not trust those authority figures and their advice.

Part of this might be just normal human nature; but a big part of it is that authority figures are often simply not reliable. They set and enforce rules based on fears, or their own convenience, or their own pride or status instead of actually making rules which are for the benefit of the person under authority.

I don't think there's such a thing as a human incapable of violence, given the right situation. Check out the reaction of every other mammal on the planet when cornered in a life-threatening situation. Many are incapable of effective violence, but as a last resort it's hardwired. Being a peaceful person on a daily basis is a measure of how socialized you are and how much negotiation and compromise you're capable of, but that in turn is a measure of your ability to evaluate risk and threat in a sane, socialized way. Non-peaceful people are in some ways reacting to everything as if it were a threat to their lives.

Harmlessness and peaceability are orthogonal to each other. One can be violent and harmless just as easily as peaceable and dangerous.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com