Well, it’s still not “rm -rf” right? Why is it misleading then?

A typical problem of this is when having to run a script (say rm -rf dist) in windows and mac systems not the command itself

How many Linux/Mac devs know that? We live in a left-pad world, of course people will install a package to get a simple job done.

The reason I used rimraf was it was a way to make JS delete all files in the directory. Why would I need to think to shell out to "rm -rf dir" and be responsible for argument escaping, error handling, different shells, etc. If that's what the library does, ok, but it can do it in any way the library devs decided was best. I offloaded that decision to them (putting more trust in them to do it right than in myself).