Yea, it is fair feedback.
I respect the Iceberg team & their work.
I've been shying away from that post cause I don't wanna start a flamewar, but I will reflect on this and reconsider. Thank you.
I respect the Iceberg team & their work.
I've been shying away from that post cause I don't wanna start a flamewar, but I will reflect on this and reconsider. Thank you.
But, particularly if you acknowledge opposing views in your content and don't hide counterarguments via cherry picking, you will really add value to the data community in exposing the truth, and educating people both on your team and the other team which ultimately spurs improvements where both sides have gaps and performs a greater benefit for the broader community.
It takes courage and care to put a controversial rigorous viewpoint out there; you do risk your "reputation". But, particularly if you make corrections where appropriate, people will recognize you as genuine.
It is not bad to have a point of view. What is bad is to hide your bias or counterarguments to deceive people.
Be part of the thesis + antithesis-> synthesis Hegelian dialog that brings progress. Ultimately as you advocate for your customers (developers/data users), not "your team", you will perform a true service to the community, even if only you and a few others recognize it.