French cheese under threat from lack of microbial diversity
news.cnrs.fr
news.cnrs.fr
- Jort
- Marie Harel
- Gillot
- Moulin de CarelActually, one could argue there's potential danger in good cheese. A danger for pasteurized cheese of course.
Ofc I moved to China and now all I can eat is Brie.
Personally I've never been a fan, except when barbecued.
The link below lists only the protected ones.
https://tradicional.dgadr.gov.pt/en/categories/cheese-and-ot...
My favourite one for eating on a slice of bread with some soup : Orval. Another favourite of mine, close to Orval: Fromage d'Amblève/Ameler Käse.
And this leads me to Chouffe and McChouffe beers, and Lupulus.
But yesterday we bought one in Esteron that finally tasted how it's supposed to taste.
So it still exists, but as with anything popular, it dies from tragedy of the common.
The problem's been around since time immemorial.
HN-celebrated Tom Scott did a video on it last year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evV05QeSjAw
YouTube links are a terrible way to transmit information.
I don’t have the book handy, but here is a quote from the web:
> I started working with a French company in America, and they were trying to sell French cheese to the Americans. And they didn't understand, because in France the cheese is alive, which means that you can buy it young, mature or old, and that's why you have to read the age of the cheese when you go to buy the cheese. So you smell, you touch, you poke. If you need cheese for today, you want to buy a mature cheese. If you want cheese for next week, you buy a young cheese. And when you buy young cheese for next week, you go home, [but] you never put the cheese in the refrigerator, because you don't put your cat in the refrigerator. It's the same; it's alive. We are very afraid of getting sick with cheese.
They’re clearly not talking about the benign strains.
I agree GP is being silly though.
On the other hand the immune system selects for beneficial bacteria, which take up space and nutrients so that really harmful ones can't colonize: https://sci-hub.se/10.1038/nri3535; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05141-x
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a type of Escherichia coli and one of the leading bacterial causes of diarrhea in the developing world,[1] as well as the most common cause of travelers' diarrhea.[2] Insufficient data exists, but conservative estimates suggest that each year, about 157,000 deaths occur, mostly in children, from ETEC.[3][4][5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterotoxigenic_Escherichia_co...
The most common sources for Shiga toxin are the bacteria S. dysenteriae and some serotypes of Escherichia coli (STEC), which includes serotypes O157:H7, and O104:H4.[4][5]
Symptoms of Shiga toxin ingestion include abdominal pain as well as watery diarrhea. Severe life-threatening cases are characterized by hemorrhagic colitis (HC).[15]
The toxin is associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome. In contrast, Shigella species may also produce shigella enterotoxins, which are the cause of dysentery.
Is curiously a double true. Either way you take it, there is always a possible interpretation that leads to a logical, non-satirical meaning.
Except in a tiny number of cases it is unpleasant but short and not threatening (remember to drink a lot, though, the most dangerous effect is dehydration).
I never got sick eating cheese, but that's actually possible Salmonella, Listeria, E.Coli, Tick-borne encephalitis virus (and you could die from it, in rare occasions).
And one thing I love about "real" cheese is variation. Depending on the season, conditions,... and chance, you get cheese that is different. Not always great, sometimes I am disappointed, but there are other occasions where the result is so good that it is well worth the occasional disappointment. Industrial cheese is boring, it is never bad, but it is never good either.
As for being sick. I never got sick with cheese, despite eating cheese on a daily basis. And I have eaten cheese that is way after its "use by" date, cheese with the "wrong" mold, cheese strong enough to numb the tongue after eating a tip of a knife worth, cheese I forgot until smell alerted me of its presence,... and all that raw milk. I didn't try the kind with maggots yet though.
I know that cheese borne diseases exist, but overall, for how alive it is, cheese is surprisingly safe. In fact, that's the big idea with cheese. It is full of bacteria and molds that we know are safe, and these tend to outcompete the pathogenic ones.
I love the underlying tone to this. The French are a civilized people who care about the age of their cheese.
While the country bumpkin Americans lack the sophistication and knowledge of cheese age.
I mean, really?
What I can tell you is that I religiously avoid cheeses made in USA, because they generally taste horrible. Cheeses from continental Europe are generally fine.
Outdoors is "refrigerator" temperatures only in perhaps March-May and September-October.
But that still doesn't make sense, since we usually keep cheese indoors, where it is is nice and comfortable.
Definition of warm or cool can't be the same with this kind of difference - and I'd imagine similar could be said about the US, they have southerly regions where hot and wet indoor ambient atmosphere can't be cheese-safe most of the time. You guys are having it easy when it comes to food safety.
One time I had a mild fever that I'm sure was from eating the stuff, but recovered overnight.
If they've identified the genes that led to the bacteria becoming infertile, then they should be able to reverse the genetic changes.
> “Genome editing is another form of selection. What we need today is the diversity provided by sexual reproduction between individuals with different genomes.”
That kind of reads like nonsense, or phobia of genetic engineering.
The only reason sexual reproduction would be required is if the original strains are not fit any more due to new selective pressures in the modern environment.
But then you run the risk of changing the properties (flavor) of cheese since it's constantly mutating. So your 2010 Brie might taste different than 2030 Brie from the same brand.
In research this was solved by making stocks of your strain once you're happy with it and freezing it at -80C so you can keep going back to it.
Hopefully, yes.
> Until the 1950s, Camemberts still had grey, green or in some cases orange-tinged moulds on their surface. But the industry was not fond of these colours, considering them unappealing, and staked everything on the albino strain of P. camemberti, which is completely white and moreover has a silky texture.
Give me the orange camembert please.
Visual paste.
I've done a little bit of cheesemaking, and I think it's very unusual for an average human immune system to get poisoned by cheese. You very quickly know if something's gone wrong in the process. Same goes for clabber, cultured butter, yoghurt, kefir. In fact I'd say raw milk is the greater risk.
There are plenty of small cheese makers with diverse biomes and we buy from them every day.
They all have their own batch, many are unique passed from generations or affected by the animals they raise.
Nobody expect supermarket cheese to be sustainable anymore than their standardized vegetable.
In any case, cheese is difficult to replicate due to the nature of the proteins in milk. There are companies that have made casein in bioreactors that will hopefully soon put products on the market.
Until then, there are other alternatives, but don't expect them to have the same flavor and texture. Some of the best ones are not trying to be a facsimile. There's the Vegan Cheese Co that maintains a worldwide database of vegan cheeses, and here's the list from their yearly awards:
However, my experience is not all farms are so aggressive even in the USA (look for bull bred) and in France I've seen plenty of cheese making operations very in touch with traditional methods and not what I'd personally call cruel at all (sheep cheese made in the Pyrenees in particular)
Also the regulations in France prevent a constant pregnancy. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/le-bien-etre-et-la-protection-de...
I think things could be improved of course and I'm all for improving the lot of animals.
My favorite locally produced moldy nut cheese (Omage) does not have a flavor or texture like any dairy cheese I've tasted. IMO, dairy cheeses taste more different from each other than vegan versions taste from the dairy cheese they are mimicking (usually by using the exact same cultures).
With all the modern biotech we have, and the speed at which you can breed microorganisms, I don't think we should shrink from the challenge of domesticating new microbes from wild sources, and we should celebrate any new interesting flavors that come from it. Tradition (i.e. DO dairy cheese) is peer pressure from dead people.
I hope someday there's a society we've managed to build that's good enough to look back on the 20th and 21st centuries with the judgemental glare we rightly deserve.
How much of it is actually thrown away though? It's my understanding that the "ugly" looking vegetables are just used to make sauces, canned produce, ready meals etc etc. No one is throwing out perfectly good tomatoes just because they are ugly - they just get turned into something else.
Throwing or not throwing away the food would make no difference in the lives of the people going hungry. The people going hungry are going hungry not because of a dearth of food, but due to issues such as war or political or family instability.
The above sounds very harsh. Obviously there are some schemes that allow excess food to be used by poorer people, like food banks, quality tiers, common agricultural policy type schemes, or just ensuring everyone has sufficient income through tax breaks or benefit schemes. Food banks give food away for free, and they are very limited in scope, and therefore have a limited affect on food price. Quality tiers are things like a supermarket selling "wonky veg" next to full-price veg, but you'll tend to notice that the wonky veg isn't actually much lower in price than the full-price veg. The EU's old common agricultural policy scheme effectively solved the problem by getting the government to guarantee that a food grower could sell their food for a viable price, but it led to huge complaints about "butter mountains" and waste - I think the point was missed that this waste was a reasonable trade-off for ensuring that food continued to be produced in sufficient quantities even in a bad year, and the fact that the government bought the excess meant that they owned it and could if they wanted to feed the hungry with it. Tax breaks and benefit schemes solve the problem without lowering the price of the food because the food seller still gets paid full price for the food.
My point is that good intentions have generated schemes to get excess food to hungry people, but they necessarily have to be small in scale to avoid negatively affecting economics.
Putting entire political-social-economic discussions aside, this argument relies on "Wonky Veg" being cheap from farm to market, which isn't always the case, and therefore do not work at scale in real world.
Put simply, perfectly equal-sized and spherical tomatoes roll easier on conveyor belts, fit nicer and denser in cardboard boxes, slices evenly with machines, and therefore often cheaper to your table than odd shaped ones, at the same time being more lucrative to trade.
Of course it feels wrong to grow crops only to crush some, I wholeheartedly agree, but this needs a bit more thoughts than trying to "just" save them.
In the same way that a sudden interest in therapy for dogs would prove that dogs were suffering from a mental health crisis. Yeah, you want to sell produce at a premium so that somewhat well-off people can feel like they are making a difference? Sounds good to me, yup yup. I mean the vagaries and arbitrariness of upper/upper-middle class social signaling is a trope in itself.
Evidence for this? Any at all? Because I can’t imagine someone getting caught in the act of frowning in disgust which then immediately causes a shop owner to toss out that and similar-looking produce in the hopes that no one else will be disgusted. And how you would cook up such a causal connection is beyond me.
What actually happens—and which just trivially follows from good old “economics”—is that perfectly good food is thrown out because you make more money by eliminating supply that can’t be sold. (Maybe also food regulations, I don’t know.)
Yeah that'd be pretty crazy, probably why that's not what happens. It's far likelier that the produce is filtered on the farm before it even gets to a supplier.
https://econreview.berkeley.edu/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugl...
> What actually happens—and which just trivially follows from good old “economics”—is that perfectly good food is thrown out because you make more money by eliminating supply that can’t be sold. (Maybe also food regulations, I don’t know.)
I think that's more why they lock the dumpsters behind grocery stores and/or dump bleach on the food, but that's also disgusting, so, lateral move I think.
Then there’s the crucial farmer link. Which is just some loose “farmers we’ve talked to, like X” (one step above “people are saying”) and a link to a human interest or whatever you call those uninteresting subject-driven The New Yorker articles.
I don’t know how people are in the USA (spoiler alert), but where I am from food is the everyday grocery product that people are most stingy about.[3] Lower prices are always good. So it seems bewildering that the consumer would send such signals to the Market—surely this would cause higher prices for the consumer? Not only that but here (like in America) there are farmer subsidies. Payed for by tax payers which are also consumers.
(And Americans care about food æstehetics that much? Well let’s look to the article again: “Psychologists argued that the lack of public interest in ugly food was connected to self-esteem.” What the fuck? Seriously?)
Not to mention inflation which makes such everyday products more expensive. Which everyone who cares about Economics on this site seems to be tearing their hair out over on a weekly basis.
The article talks about how these noble startups are enabling ugly produce to be sold to smoothie retailers or whatever. Or juice factories... like the Market is so catastrophically mismanaged that you need a hipster startup for that? To connect that an orange shaped like Steve Buscemi doesn’t taste bad as juice?
I am not being negative about the article by the way. Just the Movement. The article raises the question several times about whether this is really A Thing or if it is an astroturf, someone trying to make a buck on real climate change and environmental issues. Just look at penultimate paragraph.
> The ugly produce movement exemplifies the twenty-first century consumer’s reliance on social media to navigate lifestyle changes. Food waste isn’t a simple problem; it’s an example of the broken agricultural system’s inability to distribute resources in a way that benefits all consumers. If individuals really want to be part of the solution, they have to look beyond the glitzy marketing of ‘socially responsible’ firms and become more vigilant of companies that claim to have an answer for everything.
Would you look at that.
A somewhat funny part is where they describe how the customers of these things are higher-income because it is more expensive. So the Market is so screwed up that “ugly food” isn’t something that the poor buy out of practical necessity? It’s been relegated to social indulgences-buying upper-middle class uh, people?
All in all this damning evidence that you have presented here demonstrates to me that The Ugly Food Movement is a silly, boutique food practice that some I Want To Make a New Consumer Need marketing firm cooked up, some startups made A Thing, and that upper-middle class water cooler NPCs are probably now doing the good work of spreading the word about.
[1] Because if this was about consumer choice, according to these startups, what difference would a new kind of company make?
[2] “One innovative company called [Redacted], based in [Hipsterville, USA]”
[3] Just imagine if people were given the chance to buy almost-expired or some other such ugly food... and of course they are and people love it. Why the heck do you need a startup for that?
My point was never that startups are helping yuppies save the world by getting yuppies to buy ugly food. My point was, that food being deemed as below standard and thrown out, in any amount, is disgusting in a world that still has food-insecure people in it. That's it. I don't give a shit about these startups. If it is true what they say that they are indeed bridging a gap between food that would otherwise be discarded and well-meaning people who want to change how they consume in such a way that's slightly more beneficial to the world, then more power to them. That's a good thing, IMO. But it is also a band-aid solution to the larger problems of the logistics of food production and distribution, and if anything, it's an extension of one of the bigger problems in itself: that food is not grown, shipped, and sold to feed people, it is done to make money and therefore, if a given group of people exists that it is not profitable to sell food to, they will not be fed. That, to me, is disgusting.
The rest of this is a lot of waffle about how stupid Americans are and I'm just not interested in that as a topic.
Edit: Yeah I just saw your other comment and it's clear you're just here with an axe to grind about people you perceive to be richer than yourself, and, I dunno man, maybe that's important, but to me it's boring. Go find someone else to grind it with.
You posted an article, I responded to it. Standard fare.
(Before you argue damage is cosmetic, a significant break in the skin molds quickly)
Too bad I can't find that original article, which went into a lot more detail than Wikipedia.
Are you some kind of cheese nerd, or is this not all that unusual for a Swiss fridge?
First swiss often do fondue with 2 different cheeses, the usual moitié-moitié mix of Vacherin fribourgeois and Gruyère. Then sometimes you have 2 to 3 different raclette cheeses because you like different tastes. Then there are the cheese you might grate on your pastas (in my case I would usually use italian cheeses) and the different cheese you want to offer at the table in regular diners + the ones dedicated for the aperitives like Tête de Moine...It can add up quickly without being a nerd.
Of course you can fondue with any kind of cheese. I love using Dutch farmer's cheese in my fondue. In fact, my brother-in-law has recently started making cheese which is very suitable for it.
I'm Dutch, and I don't have 20 cheeses, but 5 different cheeses is very common, and more than 10 is not rare for us.
It always has a ridiculous "luxury" tax, ending up above 50€/kg, which is absurd for Italy...
...I'm guilty of using too much of it... it often also is my go to snack during late night fridge peeping... but hey, there are worse (and costlier) habits to entertain
Maybe a stupid question, but how can you remember all those different types of cheeses and what they taste like? I'd have to have an extensive notebook every time I went to the store if I wanted to manage 20 types of cheese.
(My typical fancy cheese buying system is to go to the store and buy something at random and hope I like it, which since I like cheese, often works out, but it means buying it again can be almost impossible)
We do the same but with cheeses.
ABBA’s Goudas Just Wanna Have Fun and Eminem’s The Real Slim Cheddy from 3Mile. Beatle’s Let it Brie!
Whatever. Knowing 20 of pretty much anything isn't some One Weird Thing. Get out more. Maybe try something new. You have my sympathy.
I'm not from one of the big cheese nations of Europe, when I grew up we had one kind of cheese for everything, but a couple of years ago I tried to broaden my palette, buy everything I could in local shops and supermarkets, and remembering twenty different kinds of cheese is not difficult.
What also helps is that these cheeses are significantly different, so Emmentaler, Camembert, Parmigiano Reggiano, Mozzarella, Bavarian Blu, Manchego, Pecorino, Gouda, Feta, etc, they all are very different, and most supermarkets in Europe have them all, so you can try out things easily.
I’ve tried buying most of these different cheeses in an upscale American supermarket and have been very disappointed. Even the ones imported from Europe, every variety just sort of tastes either gross or too similar. I swear Manchego tasted better 20 years ago the first time I had it in the US, maybe then big business got ahold of it. The best cheese I’ve ever tasted as an American was actually an expired Limburger cheese. It had such an amazing taste, I’m not joking. But it was at a weird outlet store that sells expired food and I never saw it again.
The only semi exception to this rule (although I still have to make sure it’s authentic!) is buying Parmigiano Reggiano, that stuff is a staple in our household.
Then again the best steak I’ve ever eaten was a 45 day dry aged steak, so I guess I just like funky flavors. Tasted like the most amazing cheese + amazing steak at the same time.
It's part of your culture because you discuss guns all the time, well in France, we do the same but for cheese.
I'm not sure this applies in paris though, I suspect it does not. It's such a big city it's likely the markets are similar to american ones, being targeted & priced at affluent upper middle class professionals. IDK though I have spent very little time in paris.
Again idk about paris. Lived in france for many years and still back regularly for family. But spent maybe a week total in paris, and even that was over a decade ago.
(I did once get a very lame baguette at a Monoprix once. Blew my mind that the French tolerated it.)
One possibility is that you were there out of season. We've gotten very good at preserving apples for all year, but they are harvested only for a month or so. It takes industrial climate control to make them taste good after about December.
As in, where the brandy comes from? I never knew it was eponymous. Booze is of course the original technology for preserving apples and fruit in general. My understanding is that was the original intended purpose for our older orchards included those planted by Johnny Appleseed.
Reminds me of Luther Burbank:
We tend to buy bread in supermarkets only in case of dire emergency. Statistically, there probably was a much better bakery around the corner from that Monoprix.
> It takes industrial climate control to make them taste good after about December.
I remember my grand mother keeping apples in her cellar (cold but not freezing, dry, close to constant temperature year round). The apple she put there were fantastic long into winter. They would not look great, slightly shrunk and with wrinkles, but the taste was excellent. Industrial climate control is to keep them look good, not to keep them taste good.
Apples are also an odd fruit because they can be kept for such a long time: https://www.foodrenegade.com/your-apples-year-old/ this makes shipping them anywhere much easier than a tomato...
Johnny Appleseed is American. The US has a huge diversity of apple trees based on locality.
However, like so many things, said diversity is seasonal. There is a good reason for pressing apple cider--you need to do something with the enormous number of apples you couldn't eat directly.
If you want apples out of season, you're only going to see the mass-manufactured ones.
Since these cultivars were no longer connected by breeding, they changed characteristics over several centuries giving rise to an absolutely enormous diversity of local apple types in the US--especially since apple trees from seed are kinda unstable genetically.
IF you take the seeds of a tomato you will get a mostly decent tomato out of it. IF you take the seeds of an apple or a haas avocado you will likely get something that looks nothing like its parent. Unlike tomatoes it takes a LONG time to grow a tree, so if you want an avocado or apple orchard your going to use grafts to make sure you get the best chance of having a good product in 5 or 10 years...
The economics of commonality should be readily apparent... pick something that you know works for your multi year bet to pay off sounds like a good plan.
Avocados are also interesting because we DO get other varieties due to how it reproduces (you need plants of both sexes). IM fairly sure that apples do not have this issue so farms are monocultures.
Add on to that the fact that the varieties we see are designed to be kept long enough to have a birthday and this is what you get.
Johnny Appleseed walking through colonial American planting apple trees? he was a hippy promoting more fermentation of alcoholic apple cider, for which sour apples work just fine.
virtually all French wine grapes, btw, are grown from cuttings grafted onto American root stocks because the native roots were not resistant to the invasive Phylloxera fly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylloxera
it is because of grafting that we have variety in these cases.
ie, most of the time they won't be sweet eating apples- in the US in particular this used to be less of a problem, because apples were for cider / alcohol. During prohibition entrepreneurs got active in trying to save their industry (while others were just ploughing orchards over) and we get modern ideas like "an apple a day" and the whole modern sweet eating apple became very mainstream. Not that eating apples weren't a thing before that, but it helped explode their popularity in modern western eating habits.
I just checked the websites of about half a dozen orchards within a reasonable driving distance from me, and they all had a range of 30-40 varieties. Not all will be ripe at the same time; 15-20 all at once is going to be a huge orchard!
However, if you want to see some truly weird apples, heirlooms offer way more interest and variety if you can find them. (This probably involves making friends with people who have old trees, rather than finding a shop that sells them.)
For example, I live on an old family farm with an heirloom apple variety (unknown name, if it was ever named at all, but dating back to at least the 1850s) that is spicy and bubbles/fizzes when you bite into it. It's quite cool, and I think it is something some people would want to buy, but it is unsuited to modern commercial production for a few reasons; for example, it fruits on new wood at the tips of the branches, which makes it less suited to modern tree pruning strategies (all modern apple varieties fruit on older wood, which makes them much easier to prune).
In my experience, the average US grocery store has a vast selection of produce and I see the pattern with apples (standard base varieties, with some rotating specials) across most categories of produce - citrus, cucumbers, peppers, root veggies, etc.
So in short, I dunno, I actually feel like there's a massive variety of agricultural products in the US. Certainly way more than in Switzerland, the country in which I've been to the grocery store the most outside of the US. Coop has like 3 kinds of apples, Migros was a bit better and had some interesting Kanzi apples which I had not seen in the states.
YMMV ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Otherwise, any farmer’s market in Britany and Normandie will have plenty of interesting apple varieties.
The problem though is that those more unconventional cultivars tend to only be available seasonally.
My fat american butt eventually relented a few days later and I bought a single breast from them. It wasn't even good Popeyes. Tasted like either they dont know how to make a good crispy piece of chicken or Europe gets sent the scraps.
Five Guys also showed up, their pistachio shake was intriguing but a huge disappointment.
I don't like what Paris has become, multiple French bistros have dropped in quality post-COVID(in my opinion).
Also seems like Costa coffee has abandoned the city? Their coffee wasn't anything to go crazy over but it had good memories when I was a broke unemployed dev touring Europe via backpack.
I blame big food corporations for trying to homogenize, sterilize, pasteurize, and genericize the taste/appearance/chacteristics of food to the equivalent of white bread. Society just trudges along with it with extremely low awareness as to how much better it can be.
Its also why ugly food industry took off and companies like misfit markets or imperfect foods have billions of dollars in business, who've created a market for ugly looking perfectly edible food
However, when I did study abroad in Costa Rica, I ate a lot of different kinds of fruit out of people's backyard fruit trees. All the best bananas I tried there had entirely black peels (no yellow at all), yet the fruit was firm and not overripe, and they were so indescribably good that they completely ruined supermarket bananas for me. I no longer eat bananas.
they are way too sweet for me when the skin is mostly black... I do like fermented pepper hot sauce though
But that's not whats being claimed. He's rebutting the claim (which the original commenter may or may not have implied) that artificial banana flavor is like the old banana's that dont exist anymore. He, nor anyone here, is saying artificial banana tastes like real banana. And if someone like that shows up lets get them.
Took me close to a decade to enjoy bananas again. I still don't like bananas or pears that are too ripe, mostly because they become too sugary for my taste, but also because of the stronger flavour.
Pretty similar to the fishing industry actually. Focus on short-term profits and none on long term sustainability :'(
It’s also complete clickbait nonsense to suggest blue cheeses will go away. When the reality is they may add some more colors, or have to come up with some more options. But these cheeses aren’t going anywhere.
According to the article Camembert and Brie are more at risk as their white mold is more rare. They won't disappear either, but if we don't do something, they may stop being white and start being blue, and maybe taste a little different. It doesn't mean they can't make good cheeses, but it will be different from the cheeses we know.
> Consequently, the fungi that have accumulated multiple deleterious mutations in their genomes over years of vegetative propagation become virtually infertile, adversely affecting cheese production. “This is what happens when we completely stop using sexual reproduction,” Giraud explains. “It’s the only way to compensate for detrimental mutations through the introduction of new genes – the famous genetic mixing.”
Live and learn. Seems like a common story in agriculture. Perhaps we can relearn this lesson in the context of human propagation someday.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillium_roqueforti
Yes, most of the penicillin breaks down... but..
I do the others as well like ranch, so it's not that common and I get away with it I think.
Are you saying penicillin allergies cause or influence this? Or simply coincidental, since many people in general like blue cheese.
Also, supposedly penicillin allergies are often inaccurate. Either false diagnosis as a child or simply growing out of it. Guess maybe blue cheese could be a good test.
I don't know is the correct most answer I can provide.
In terms of am I allergic, oh ya, no question. Recently been minorly exposed and reaffirmed that one again. Though typically I must take it internally to really screw me up.
Blue cheeses taste like it's an elixer of the gods to me. totally unlike all other things. I enjoy practically all other cheeses, but they are not quite the same thing.
> The allergic reactions to penicillin are caused by the beta-lactam ring in the penicillin compound, which is not present in the Penicillium roqueforti mold.
Do you know that to be incorrect? Just searching it seems correct about beta-lactam allergy, but I'm not sure about what's in P. roqueforti.
I couldn't help but chuckle. The mouldy cheese industry says something is unappealing.