> Why are you introducing this 'last decade' thing. Was the decade before not relevant?

I'm arguing that policy preferences around copyright infringement have changed in general. In general, in 1990s, copyright infringement meant "crime, reprehensible, police, prisons, etc." for both individuals and coporations. In general, in the past decade, it's meant none of those things for either individuals or corporations. Yet it's meant fines and lawsuits for corporations with virtually none I can find, in America, aimed at individuals.

Also, LLMs were basically invented less than a decade ago [1].

> seems like misdirection

"Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like" [2].

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html