John Lasseter drew the BSD daemon logo
jacobelder.com
jacobelder.com
> The later, more popular versions of the BSD Daemon were drawn by animation director John Lasseter beginning with an early greyscale drawing on the cover of the Unix System Manager's Manual published in 1984 by USENIX for 4.2BSD.[7] Its author/editor Sam Leffler (who had been a technical staff member at CSRG) and Lasseter were both employees of Lucasfilm at the time. About four years after this Lasseter drew his widely known take on the BSD Daemon for the cover of McKusick's co-authored 1988 book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD Operating System.[8] Lasseter drew a somewhat lesser-known running BSD Daemon for the 4.4BSD version of the book in 1994.
As far as I can tell, there is no direct connection. Sam Leffler contributed most to the 4.1BSD and 4.2BSD while at Berkeley [1], while NeXTSTEP was based on Mach which was based on 4.2BSD and developed by Richard Rashid and Avie Tevanian at Carnegie Mellon [2].
Perhaps the indirect connection is that, before Linux, BSD was the natural choice for an open-source UNIX derivative, and Steve Jobs had an instinct for seeking out the leading edges of computing at the time.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_J._Leffler
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_(kernel)#Development
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_Laboratories%2C_In....
Wow, Phil Foglio as well? The origin story gets even more interesting. Here is a page that features the original artwork: http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/shirts/usenix.html
First, you will not have bluetooth. Second, it is slow in ways that will matter. As in, you will feel it, but not be annoyed by it (Especially with a web browser). Third, KDE plasma support is a work in progress (read: most people do not get KDE plasma on an OpenBSD installation today, although it won't stay like this forever).
With these disclaimers out of the way, I can heartily encourage it. I love having an operating system that I can trust. Things work, things are well doccumented and things are very very clean.
I'm a long-time fan of OpenBSD (I started using it in 1999) and I strongly second reading the warnings on the label.
But in terms of "the Wi-fi actually worked without pulling teeth" it was streets ahead of both FreeBSD and Debian.
https://www.debian.org/releases/
I love the homages/easter eggs in the *nix world
Deb broke up with Ian and then Ian had a tragic end. It is a name surrounded by tragedy.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9e_French
[1] https://www.abebooks.com/comics/GRIT-BATH-Nos-1-3-French-Ren...
I have a soft spot in my heart for Foglio's early work, like "What's New with Phil & Dixie" from Dragon magazine and his adaptation of Myth Adventures. I'm particularly fond of The Winslow[1]. Sadly, nobody I know has ever read more than a few Phil & Dixie cartoons and I just get weird looks if I talk about The Winslow.
-FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, GNU/Linux with slackware CD's...
This is like getting avionics industry manuals and hardware for free and with a press of a button you could get a self-assembled UFO with an antigravity field by half the price of a car.
There's a "Used - Good" quality one for $4.
https://www.instagram.com/aguasfrescaslupita
The truck I saw has him maybe 4 feet tall on the left hand side: https://9ol.es/tmp/PXL_20240110_021538249.jpg
We should invite them to like, a linux conference or something. They'd be very popular.
Gary Fisher (Fisher Mountain Bikes) had worked light shows for the Grateful Dead and went on to make an officially sanctioned Grateful Dead bicycle[0][1] with proper artwork.
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2021/01/21/msg...
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/openbsd-nix-is-now-a-thing/255...
and he gets praised for drawing "a version" of something that someone else created. ohhh the irony.
Or is it just the cases where it's convenient to virtue signal?
I also find it ironic that you posted a Steve Jobs quote in a comment recently...
Of course you can't do any of this 100% because the world is interconnected and interdependent and countless infinite things are indirect.
But so what? You can still care and still try and still exert your own one-persons share of influence, even if it's only avoiding Amazon when you can, instead of just buying everything through them.
That is worth doing and 100% better than not caring and not bothering, and the value isn't invalidated by being impossible to be absolute.
I'm not saying it should, but it seems you're either unaware of, or don't consider relevant, the most actually troublesome aspects of the man.
The mans worst crime is singing.
On the other hand, his great creative talent should not diminish the fact that he was a creep of a boss if you happened to be female.
He's a complex person. If we want to talk about the great things he has done, I think we should also remind ourselves of the bad stuff.
Interesting that you can't spot these things.
For someone who's had so many successful movies you'd think they'd defend him to the hilt if he was innocent?
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/john-las...
You could make the same argument about Fatty Arbuckle, who was falsely accused of rape and manslaughter in the 1920’s and completely blacklisted from Hollywood despite probably being completely innocent. I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other about Lasseter but these things are driven by Hollywood politics more than anything. Just look at how long they kept supporting Roman Polanski.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2017/11/21/d...
Bill Gates apparently had some connection to Jeffrey Epstein that made his wife uncomfortable enough to divorce him, yet we didn't need to bring that up when his book review got posted yesterday.
Maybe we can celebrate and enjoy the good things about a person without needing to continually shame them for the bad things.