Neri Oxman reportedly plagiarized undergrad thesis of student she supervised
twitter.com
twitter.com
Plagiarism of the discussion section and analysis would be one thing, but a list of methods or materials is a nothing burger.
(it's an analogous to listing the constituents of your bread recipe, and it's compassion on your reader not to rewrite these constituents in a new way every time.)
as a engineering consultant, the most valuable assets are the reports I can pull and reuses.
while original research and academics should reference text, even M&P should reference where it came from.
knowing what deviated and what adheres to any given procedures are still important.
if this were some consultant report, then go nuts.
also, keep in mind the context that this person, her husband and I believe Harvard are a discussion about "plagiarism"
My colleague (another grad student) innocently showed them their work and was very open with them.
[1]https://twitter.com/sTeamTraen/status/1745950571687792967
[2]https://www.businessinsider.com/neri-oxman-plagiarize-wikipe...
Eg, was it a key original idea central to the work's thesis, in which they may have stolen someone else's breakthrough insight? Was it an important bit of supporting information, but not a core part of the thesis? Or was it background/extraneous stuff that's not really important?
Maybe there were other more egregious examples I didn’t see, but that seems like an editing or style error more than what I’d consider plagiarism.
(Obviously students, who are being assessed directly on the writing itself, have very rigid requirements they need to meet)