Modern society sometimes still has that in limited form (mandatory military service), but it's very different, and time-limited.
Modern society sometimes still has that in limited form (mandatory military service), but it's very different, and time-limited.
That is the thing, however - they weren't, at least not in feudal system. Peasants would be present only as personal servants of nobility, but weren't actually expected to fight. "All men under arms" is only typical of tribal society, but in that case theywere basically defending their homes - and also hoping to profit.
The article brings some pretty decent arguments that suggest you are wrong:
> For common soldiers, it was an opportunity to get rich or at least gain some wealth.
> Masses of peasants willingly went to try and liberate the Holy Land – only to get slaughtered because they did not wait for backup by professional soldiers. Later, during the Ottoman Wars, peasants under John Capistrano played a major role in defense of Belgrade.
There was also the whole "children's crusade" episode.