But this is much different, and likely much worse, than paid ChatGPT. Code Interpreter does its own debugging-and-revising loop.
It's bizarre to me that this author wouldn't pay $20 one time to evaluate the higher quality product, the one most people would use if they cared about code quality, am I missing something?
ChatGPT is a product built on top of gpt-4.
It includes many features that were built on top of the api (not as a a part of it)
So it’s the same model, but the chatgpt product has more features than just text generation
And depending on the subject and/or what you're trying to do, it will have a larger impact the just talking to the model
- ChatGPT pros:
Has some bells and whistles like code interpreter (which I can easily get via Open Interpreter).
Has plugins (although I found web browsing to be inferior compared to Poe/Perplexity).
- Pure GPT-4 API pros:
Is not dumbed down or forced to "forget" things or be lazy in coding.
I use the API either programmatically or through Poe.
They’ll spend weeks, years even, coding a solution in an effort to not pay for it.
Penny wise but pound foolish.
An extreme blindspot.
Every introverted dev should go outside and meet other people, check out the irl marketplaces with 1 coffee for 10$, thats the best investment they can make.
And I yet I still get baited everytime