While I do agree with your sentiment here, I think the gimbal video has not been debunked as of yet, if we don't include random YouTubers.
> The "best" evidence is always a video of photo of such a poor quality that anything could be interpreted into it.
I think modern military cameras, like the one in the gimbal video, are not that bad in terms of quality. But yes, at this point in time, you have to come up with decent quality video and if possible extra sensors like infrared, radar, and so on to capture the phenomenon. I think it is worth investigating, no matter the outcome, because if something can be observed on multiple sensors (including video), then there is some kind of interference that could potentially expose improvement potentials for the sensors (e.g., to filter out such artifacts or to categorize them correctly).