Why landing on the moon is proving more difficult today than 50 years ago
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
During the space race America spent 2.5% of its GDP anually to land on the moon. I doubt they're willing to spend that now. And cheaper designs come with higher risks
For thirty-odd years, the US bought powerful Soviet/Russian rocket engines instead of building its own. Its rocketry and metallurgy knowledge-base is only just now getting back to where it was around 1970. (That's basically a loss of 50 years of skills and manufacturing.)
I don't think the US can replicate that level of Human resources right now, certainly not in terms of experience. The US hasn't had that many new aircraft or rockets or missiles since the Apollo program.
I think the lazy days will soon end, though, in a series of very stinging wakeup calls.
The US has been short on cash since 1971. It can't afford today what it used to be able to.
The increasing shortage of STEM graduates has also been an important factor.