You won't see anti-wind advocates talking about curfews or outright banning them though.
You won't see anti-wind advocates talking about curfews or outright banning them though.
I'm genuinely confused how they would even be part of this conversation.
Of course, if you care about birds you're going to try to solve it across multiple fronts. But cat damage should be the first thing bird-lovers try to mitigate.
That said, the enormous delta in raw numbers makes this line of argument quite spurious. Wind turbine bird strikes are magnitudes smaller than deaths from domestic cats.
> Collectively, roaming pet cats kill 546 million animals per year in Australia
https://invasives.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Pet-cat-...
> Cats kill more than a million birds every day across Australia, according to our new estimate — the first robust attempt to quantify the problem on a nationwide scale.
> By combining data on the cat population, hunting rates and spatial distribution, we calculate that they kill 377 million birds a year.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-04/cats-killing-one-mill...
> a report on bird and avifauna mortality commissioned by AGL Energy for its Macarthur Wind Farm found that 10.19 birds were killed by each turbine in a 12 month period. This equates to over 1 400 birds killed at the Macarthur Wind Farm alone and over 21 000 if extrapolated across the country.
This is likely underestimated due to scavenging but still magnitudes of difference.
https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/sen...
It's directly comparable to gun nuts justifying their right to own weapons designed to murder people by claiming that it's for "protection". Those same people have zero interest in better door locks, stronger windows, or anything that would actually protect them. They just want the guns. The protection argument was never made in good faith, it's an excuse at best.
The "wind generators kill birds" argument is the same type of thing, typically made by people that would cheerfully feed every native bird they can into a grinder and sell the pulp for a profit if they could.
Ah, it's your fault for being robbed or mugged, and killed in the process - you should've just had a better lock or not go downtown for a show.
In fact, we should victim-blame more often - we should just tell rape victims they should've had more clothes - you were asking for it after all.
Probably should tell convenience store clerks to get a different job.
We should tell police officers that they don't need guns to stop criminals with guns.
Either way, you want those people to be defenseless, and the people who are supposed to defend them to also be defenseless.
Who do you want to stop evil actions? Or does evil simply not exist?
Cops represent the legal system and by giving them guns we are giving them the capacity to be judge jury and executioner. That is wrong. That circumvents the entire legal system.
until you involve buttered toast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8yW5cyXXRc
They're still impressive little killers, but that's important to keep in mind.