Instead, their messaging strongly implied that, while it was still being tested, this would be mandatory, destroying community trust. An absolutely flubbed rollout.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/15/20893343/meetup-users-fu...
https://wptavern.com/meetup-com-introduces-rsvp-fees-for-mem...
Not saying it’s not a good app, but your selling your book.
I'm not sure what your point is. Someone requested an alternative, an alternative was proffered and the personal interest disclosed.
This implies that this app is the established norm in the Netherlands, which it isn't (but the OP would like it to be).
It's great that people can post alternatives, but personal interests aren't what I took umbrage with.
>> In the Netherlands we use Erbij, (https://erbij.app), which is now going international.
This implies that there is nationwide traction for the app which there isn't. It has 300 reviews on the app store. That's called astroturfing (or, lying).
We use datumprikker.nl, Facebook, WhatsApp and sometimes Signal or Meetup.com.
https://github.com/JonLatane/jonline https://jonline.io https://bullcity.social https://oakcity.social
When I lived in SF, I used Meetup to start + run OpenLate, a tech meetup with a few thousand members. Not having access to member email addresses was the worst part of Meetup, and it's probably the main reason the site still has users. (Data portability is a big focus of Booklet).
He doesn't have the discoverability of Meetup, of course, but handles the RSVPs and organizing. Pricing is on the website.
I’m not aware of anything else out that works like that.
It's almost more surprising that Bending Spoons thinks they can squeeze out any money out of Meetup.