Exemplar of humility.
Exemplar of humility.
Saying that as someone who’s consistently surprised by just how big his ego seems to be, getting bigger each year, didn’t think it’s possible.
The Ratatouille critic put this well - "We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgement. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read."
It’s a shame that the only person it seems has get the zen of Mathematica is Stephen Wolfram himself.
But like all software it involves tradeoffs. Fanatics of any technology or idea are never the easiest people to reason with.
I sometimes have to use it where Sympy fails, and every time it's almost constant WTF.
And it's very proprietary and very expensive.
https://www.wolfram.com/raspberry-pi/
If you have one collecting dust in a drawer, I'd heartily recommend checking it out.
https://www.wolfram.com/legal/agreements/wolfram-mathematica...
Mathematica has a C-like syntax for comments
(* this is a comment *)
but it doesn't have C++ style comments // This is a C++ commentget free kernel and wljs notebook
It's also not great as a general purpose language. It was never meant as such of course, but working in a real language where I can take stuff off a notebook and have it become a script has its advantages.
Finally, I'm willing to use open-source software that's slightly worse if the difference isn't huge, and for many use cases the difference isn't huge. For some it is, and that's where Mathematica is great.
Everyone else needs to deal with stuff like '#1 + #2 & @@@ # &/ @'.