AI Discovers That Not Every Fingerprint Is Unique

(splinter thoughts on this):

How can one call a digital fingerprint for a digital creation by my digits a copyrightable material, versus an actual fingerprint of my digits to ensure one produced said material?

If every key on a keyboard took a fingerprint scan before submitting the unicode for whats being typed?

Scould you expect a smart machine to have an individually signed keypress for the code generated?

Biological-keylogger

So if every key on a keyboard were a touch-sense input button? Then add pressure and you can get emotional sentiment analysis on angry typing or not - or thoughtful typing of a cadence of thought?

Or touch-type-training for keyboards which map to a typing style - or an educational/mental ability acuity level?

Maybe you can have a typing cadence associated with a fingerprint signature such that you can modify the behavior of a system based on who is typing what...

If the software was adaptive to how you interact with it, that would be interesting - then you can have a true provenance for snips of code?

"AI discovers something the first person to suggest its use said"

fingerprints were never thought to be unique, just unique enough for Scotland yard at the time. its literally in the original docs that are long public.