How does it compare to Obsidian? I didn't see it in any of the comparison graphs.
- Obsidian is using the resource-hag framework Electron. So it uses much more resources. Plume is built using Qt C++ and QML, and it's actually faster than comparable native apps.
- Obsidian editor is not a block editor (i.e., like Notion), so you can't put advanced blocks like a Kanban (tasks board) within the same page.
- Since it's not a block editor, you can't drag & drop different components.
Unlike Notion (which is also a web app wrapped with Electron), Plume is:
- Fast (Qt C++ vs Electron)
- Easier to use (opinionated design vs. Notion's complex databases)
- Portable (Underlying data is plaintext* vs. proprietary database)
*Currently all the notes' plaintext is stored in a database, but soon we'll change that to support arbitrary folder.
Edit: Tip 2: the screenplay looks nothing like a screenplay
> Tip 2: the screenplay looks nothing like a screenplay
Is it because the lack of middle alignment? I was thinking about that. At the end of the day it's all plaintext/markdown underneath, so I need to come up with the right syntax for that.
Only those who have used systems yielding low input latency (e.g. Commodore 64, BeOS or the Amiga) can tell that something is very wrong.
Whether sanity and productivity are correlated, I won't go into.
When you've experienced low latency, high latency is very noticeable, and drains mental health.