Soldiering has mostly been wandering and/or sitting around and then suddenly something happens that you didn't even see coming, and it either gets you or not and there isn't much you can do about it, for some time. Pitched firefights with an enemy you can at least kinda see and face and actively resist or guard against do happen, but they're not what either side is trying to do most of the time. At least in wars between somewhat-modern militaries. I think militaries/governments like to downplay the degree to which that's true, probably because it'd hurt recruitment numbers, but now we get cell phone and drone videos straight from the front.
Of course, before antibiotics and modern medicine, you were probably gonna be killed by disease before an enemy could hurt you (and if the enemy did hurt you... yeah, good chance it's still disease that strikes the killing blow). That was (one part of) the unromantic reality of war in prior centuries.
The USA has never fought an adversary that possessed a modern Air Defense System.
Even today the Israeli Military has to coordinate with Russia to not get shot down over Syria by Russian S300 and possibly S400 Missile Systems.
And when the US was fighting in Vietnam, the Vietnamese arguably had one of the best AD systems that was highly effective. The Soviets spared no expense in supplying (and often manning) their IAD.
Another piece of footage was even worse. A kamikaze drone isolated a soldier and was intentionally taunting the soldier by flying at it, pulling back, flying at it again. Like a wasp. The ending is predictable.
All of this supplemented by a cheerful "blooper" tune. And the replies show gamer-like excitement.
get on Quora and follow Roland Bartetzko: https://www.quora.com/profile/Roland-Bartetzko
who has actually been in combat (not in Ukraine) and is over in Ukraine right now helping with logistics.
Unfortunately these measures do not seem to work.. If even one actor is employing them, the rest need to also employ them in a lack of a better defence.
A non sequitur with no justification. If you are being attacked with drones, and you don’t have any, you are definitely going to lose that war.
This is like how people say nobody wins a nuclear war. Ask Ukraine how they feel about the decision to give up their nukes is going.
They had no control over their actual use. So why would Ukraine feel bad about giving them up? It was a huge benefit to get rid of them given the risks and costs associated.
They absolutely could not afford to maintain them circa 1991-2021. Not even remotely close.
Giving them up was the only thing that made any sense given their extremely low real value. If Ukraine made a mistake, it was in what they got in return for those non-functional weapons. They didn't negotiate very well.
> They had no control over their actual use
Assuming they could not bypass the protection, they could still extract the radioactive material and create their own designs.
Of course one side or the other will win a drone war, just like most any other war.
Because both sides use them.
They made armored attacks impossible for both sides. A tank is detected in 1 minute and destroyed in 10.
The Ukraine war is already causing blowback as seen in Gaza.
We should make war itself illegal.
Not with that attitude they won't.
Russia is a slightly different case because they can't make many of the parts but they can cobble them together using other CPUs. So they are hurt, but possibly helped.
We just have to work on defensive measures.